9 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 28, 2011
Vickroy v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2011)
…rejecting General Electric's federal officer removal for lack of federal subject matter jurisdiction. A removing defendant under the federal officer statute must show it acted under a federal officer's direction and has a colorable…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2009 · in the opinion
Funk v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Foster Wheeler Energy Corp.; FXY, Inc.; Gardner Denver, Inc.; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Co.; General Gasket Corp.; General Refractories Co.; Genuine Parts Co.; Georgia-Pacific, LLC; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Gorman-Rupp Co.; Goulds Pumps, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · September 3, 2009 · in the opinion
Fuller v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Denver, Inc.; Gardner-Gibson, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Gibson Homans Co.; Garlock, Inc.; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; Glidden Co.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Gould Pumps; Griffin Wheel Co.; Hanson Pipe & Products Minnesota…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · October 22, 2009 · in the opinion
Stephens v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Garlock Sealing Technologies, LLC, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.; Georgia-Pacific Corp.; General Electric Co.; General Motors Corp.; Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Grinnell Corp.; Hardie-Tynes Manufacturing Co.; Honeywell International; Imo…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · November 17, 2010 · in the opinion
Pichon v. Asbestos Defendants (2010)
…the theory of successor liability for any damages resulting from Mr. Pichon's pre-1988 exposure to asbestos-containing products manufactured and/or sold by General Motors \["GM"\]? (2) Did the trial court err by determining…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of New York · June 18, 2010
Gennone v. AJ Eckert Company, Inc. (2010)
…judgment to Detroit Diesel Corporation and dismissed the plaintiffs' claims against it with prejudice, ruling it was not a successor to General Motors' liability; the plaintiffs lost. A corporation that buys another's assets is not…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · February 1, 2011
Cone v. Agco Corp. (2011)
…trial. It argued first that it could not be liable for engines made before 1988, when it bought assets from a General Motors division. It argued second that it made no asbestos products after 1988. The…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · February 21, 2012 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2012)
…280 n. 8. Moreover, because mesothelioma, in general, is so rare, "any case occurring after a well attested and substantial asbestos exposure is commonly accepted as being caused by that exposure." Id. at 283 (footnote omitted);…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 15, 2009 · in the opinion
Daley v. AW Chesterton, Inc. (2009)
…Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. The evidentiary record…