8 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 20, 2015
Meyers v. Chesterton (2015)
Debra Meyers and Ronald Palermo, adult children of Ronald Dummitt, sued in Louisiana state court for his wrongful death from malignant mesothelioma. Dummitt worked as a Navy boiler technician from 1960 to 1988 on naval vessels, and the plaintiffs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 18, 2015
Meyers v. Chesterton (2015)
Debra Meyers and Ronald Palermo sued in Louisiana state court, alleging their father, Ronald Dummitt, died of malignant mesothelioma. He worked as a Navy boiler technician from 1960 to 1988 on naval vessels, and the plaintiffs allege he was exposed…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 4, 2008
Nostrom v. Chesterton (2008)
…Nostrom plaintiffs' Labor Law 241(6) claims against it. In this Department, the general air-contaminant regulations in section 12 of the Industrial Code do not support Labor Law 241(6) liability. Even if they applied…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)
…430, the more general instruction on substantial-factor causation: "A substantial factor in causing harm is a factor that a reasonable person would consider to have contributed to the harm. It must be more than a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion
Wille v. AC Product Liability Trust (2007)
…210 and 211) are also denied. As a general statement, Plaintiffs have provided sufficient lay and/or expert testimony to establish a prima facie case of whether there was "sufficient exposure" to these products by Plaintiffs…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 17, 2001 · in the opinion
Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…principle of stare decisis, the civil law statutes and codes are usually drafted in more general terms than common-law statutes and thus depend more on judges to render them concrete through judicial interpretation. Id. The…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…a plaintiff is no longer required to show substantial exposure. The Stark opinion and general logic may suggest that, where an expert witness can testify unequivocally that a defendant's product was the source of the…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)
…225] The doctrine of contra non valentem agere nulla currit praescriptio acts as an exception to the general rules of prescription by suspending the running of prescription when the circumstances of the case fall into one…