7 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 19, 1997
Potter v. Patterson (1997)
The widow and children of John Potter sued Mine Safety Appliances (MSA) and many other companies and individuals. They alleged he died of mesothelioma from asbestos exposure over many years of work for NOPSI. The plaintiffs settled with MSA alone…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)
…the premises of plaintiff's workplace insufficient for liability to attach to defendant); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Co., 726 F. Supp…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 24, 2023 · in the opinion
Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 17, 2001
Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)
…Pinecrest State School and Central State Hospital in Pineville, Louisiana, sued Southern Pipe and Supply, Owens-Corning, Garlock, the State of Louisiana and other defendants in 1997. They said they were exposed to asbestos-containing products…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 3, 2003
Hughes v. Olin Corporation (2003)
R.D. Hughes and his wife Letha sued Olin Corporation and other companies over his occupational exposure to asbestos. Hughes had been diagnosed with asbestosis in 1990 and had joined earlier class-action suits, keeping the right to sue if he later…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion
Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)
…was a substantial factor causing the illness by showing that in reasonable medical probability it was a substantial factor contributing to the plaintiff's or decedent's risk of developing cancer." (Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 20, 2015 · in the opinion
Meyers v. Chesterton (2015)
…the purposes of removal; however, the Federal Officer Removal Statute provides an exception. 28 U.S.C. §1442(a)(1); Hampton v. Owens-Illinois, 06-10929, 2007 WL 274974, [\1] (E.D. La. Jan. 29, 2007) …