No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

28 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · October 21, 1998

    Asbestos v. Bordelon, Inc. (1998)

    The court affirmed the jury verdicts for the plaintiffs against Owens-Corning Fiberglas (Kaylo insulation) and Rock Wool (One Shot cement), reversed the judgments against Garlock, A.W. Chesterton and Flexitallic, affirmed the judgments against Abadie…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Indiana · June 6, 1995

    Harris v. AC & S, Inc. (1995)

    The court granted summary judgment to Pittsburgh Corning, Owens-Corning, Anchor Packing and Garlock, and in part to Georgia-Pacific (for Bestwall). It denied it to John Crane, to Georgia-Pacific on its joint compound, and…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 23, 1994

    Busfield v. AC & S., Inc. (1994)

    Alva Busfield and his wife sued many asbestos companies. A jury found that Busfield had an asbestos-related disease, asymptomatic asbestosis or pleural thickening, but that it caused him no harm. The opinion does not describe where or how he was…

  4. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sholtis v. American Cyanamid Co. (1989)

    …there is little doubt that he was directly Porter Hayden GAF Armstrong Celotex Johns Manville Raybestos Manhattan Owens Corning Fiberglass exposed to [\15] and worked directly with asbestos at the plant.\[4\] His case necessarily relied…

  5. Court case · Ohio Supreme Court · September 13, 1995 · in the opinion

    Horton v. Harwick Chem. Corp. (1995)

    …America. Davis & Young Co., L.P.A., and Martin J. Murphy, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation. Ronald G. Rossetti, Jr., urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys. Vorys…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)

    821 Moreover, the plaintiff must show "the manufacturer's asbestos product was used at the specific site within the workplace where \[the plaintiff\] worked." Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion

    Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …in the scope of \[the plaintiffs\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571 N.W.2d 530, 533 (Mich…

  8. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010 · in the opinion

    Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    …the forum non conveniens motion can be granted. In that regard, Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen) is instructive. Hansen was an asbestos case with 200 named defendants. (Id…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    Vanhooser v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County (2012)

    …difficult to determine when the injury occurs and "\[n\]o temporally discrete event exists that encompasses the defendant's breach and the plaintiff's injury." (Buttram v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1977) 16 Cal.4th 520…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 16, 2023 · in the opinion

    Hutchins v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2023)

    …When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…

  11. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …9, 1993); Fisher v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 868 F.2d 1175 (10th Cir. 1989). After careful review of the release language and the circumstances surrounding its signing, as part of the settlement of a pending…

  12. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 11, 2007 · in the opinion

    Cadlo v. Metalclad Insulation Corporation (2007)

    …various companies to supply insulation materials to the LBNS upon request. The GSA was the largest supplier of insulation material to the LBNS, and this product originated from Pabco, Owens Corning, Johns-Manville, Armstrong, GAF Rubberoid…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · December 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Sparkman v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)

    …C. 2007). The South Carolina Supreme Court has adopted the "frequency, regularity and proximity test" set forth by the Fourth Circuit in Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156 (4th Cir. 1986). Henderson, 644…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020

    Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)

    Roy Hicks, who has mesothelioma that he links to asbestos exposure, sued many defendants in Illinois state court. He alleged exposure through his work for the City of Bloomington, including contact with fleet vehicles said to contain asbestos, some…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 24, 2015

    Sherin v. John Crane-Houdaille, Inc. (2015)

    …A.W. Chesterton back to state court. The court rejected Union Carbide's argument that its cross-claim against Owens-Illinois created federal jurisdiction. It still kept the state-law claims under supplemental jurisdiction. Discovery was…

  17. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 26, 2003 · in the opinion

    Taylor v. John Crane, Inc. (2003)

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 14 Cal.4th 985, 60 Cal.Rptr.2d 103, 928 P.2d 1181 (Richards) that controls here. In Richards, the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the interplay between Proposition 51 and…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)

    …for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  19. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2008 · in the opinion

    Clemmer v. John Crane, Inc. (2008)

    …new 2003). We have reviewed the instructions given to the jury and conclude that there was no error. Our Supreme Court addressed the issue of causation in asbestos cases in Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997…

  20. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion

    Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)

    …190 Cal.App.4th at p. 33.) Appellants rely on Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461 (Sparks) and Stewart to argue that John Crane did not bear its burden of providing…