No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Texas Supreme Court · July 14, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Ethyl Corp. (1998)

    …184, 133 L.Ed.2d 122 (1995); see also Friendly, Federal Jurisdiction: A General View 120 (1973) (condemning "blackmail settlements"), quoted in In re Rhone-Poulenc Rorer Inc., 51 F.3d at 1298. On the other…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 7, 2004 · in the opinion

    Hernandez v. Todd Shipyards Corporation (2004)

    …77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983), will not provide a basis for removal. As a general rule, absent diversity jurisdiction, a case will not be removable if the complaint does not affirmatively allege a federal claim…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · March 26, 2014 · in the opinion

    Young v. Agco Corporation (2014)

    …the Court need not conduct a de novo review where a party makes only "general and conclusory objections that do not direct the court to a specific error in the magistrate's proposed findings and recommendations…

  4. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · August 9, 2007 · in the opinion

    Herring v. Texaco, Inc. (2007)

    …bar date order has preclusive effect, it would call into question the "right to maintain the action," which implicates an exception to the general rule that this court will decline to review arguments abandoned below. Id…

  5. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · May 22, 2006 · in the opinion

    Creech v. Agco Corporation (2006)

    …Corporation when it bought the Kewanee boiler division assets from American Standard. The general rule in Washington is that a corporation purchasing the assets of another corporation does not, by reason of the purchase of assets…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 22, 2007 · in the opinion

    Ballenger v. Agco Corporation (2007)

    …S. 423 (1999), It is the general rule that an action may be removed from state court to federal court only if a federal district court would have original jurisdiction over the claim in suit. To…