No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  3. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 30, 2007 · in the opinion

    AstenJohnson v. Columbia Cas. Co. (2007)

    …to Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Asten represented: "It has been our policy to apprise Asten-Hill \[Manufacturing Company\]'s general liability and excess liability carriers of all pending claims, enclosing a photocopy of each Complaint…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Landry v. Columbia Casualty Company (2014)

    …a voluntary act of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs correctly argue that the general rule is that "other paper" does not render a case removable unless it is generated by the voluntary act of a plaintiff. Plaintiffs' argument fails…

  8. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …107] II. APPLICABLE LAW ON A CONTRACT TERMS USAGE Notwithstanding the general judicial community's consideration of the term "asbestosis," the issue is whether "asbestosis" is an ambiguous term as a matter of law. Applicable law…

  9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

    …Amchem, \_\_\_ U.S. at \_\_\_, 117 S.Ct. at 2248. This general theme, expressed forcefully in Amchem, is reinforced by the Court's discussion of specific issues, most of which are highly relevant to the instant case…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · January 23, 2013 · in the opinion

    Garrie v. Aiu Insurance Company (2013)

    …clear that mandatary authority to compromise a claim must be given expressly. Counsel for Cities Service apparently had the general authority to negotiate settlement terms, we have been given no evidence that counsel had express authority…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · June 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Carey Canada Inc. v. California Union Ins. Co. (1989)

    …Thus, the meaning of asbestosis was a matter of public record years before defendants' policies were sold. Numerous general circulation newspaper and magazine articles about the various asbestos-related health hazards, including articles in The New…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…