No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

9 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Malek v. Chevron U.S.A. (In re Laosd Asbestos Cases, 2019)

    …4th 1193, 1203.) The general rule is that persons are "obligated to exercise due care in \[their\] own actions so as to not to create an unreasonable risk of injury to others." (Lugtu v. California Highway…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 7, 2021 · in the opinion

    Irani v. Exxon Mobil Corporation (2021)

    …refinery, including Standard Oil of New Jersey's employee Paul Kuhl, who became general manager of the refinery. Soler testified as the person most qualified for the Chevron defendants in Sabetian v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation…

  4. Court case · Delaware Superior Court · March 24, 2014

    Mine Safety Appliances Company v. Aiu Insurance Company (2014)

    …it applies. It applies only if the insured was substantially certain that a known failure of its product would cause the plaintiff's injury, not merely aware of general disease hazards. Choice of Law; Insurance Coverage;…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 4, 2016

    South v. Texaco (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)

    …understood his 1997 release covered a future mesothelioma claim, and ordered plaintiff's counsel to disclose the settlement amount. Under the Jones Act and general maritime law, the party relying on a seaman's release bears…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…

  7. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · November 15, 1994 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1994)

    …107] II. APPLICABLE LAW ON A CONTRACT TERMS USAGE Notwithstanding the general judicial community's consideration of the term "asbestosis," the issue is whether "asbestosis" is an ambiguous term as a matter of law. Applicable law…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · January 23, 2013 · in the opinion

    Garrie v. Aiu Insurance Company (2013)

    …clear that mandatary authority to compromise a claim must be given expressly. Counsel for Cities Service apparently had the general authority to negotiate settlement terms, we have been given no evidence that counsel had express authority…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 6, 2021 · in the opinion

    Khosravan v. Chevron Corporation (2021)

    … 2778, subds. 3 & 4.) "\[Civil Code\] section 2778, unchanged since 1872, sets forth general rules for the interpretation of indemnity contracts, \unless a contrary intention appears.' If not forbidden by other, more specific, statutes, the obligations…