7 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)
Twenty asbestos companies, acting together as the Center for Claims Resolution, and class counsel agreed to settle the asbestos injury claims of a nationwide class estimated at 250,000 to 2,000,000 people. The class included people with…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007 · in the opinion
Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)
…Co., Industrial Holdings Corp; Union Carbide Corp., Amchem Products, Inc., CertainTeed Corp., Foseco, Inc., and Carborundum Co., Inc. Roetzel & Andress, Susan Squire Box, and Brad A. Rimmel, for appellee Mobil Corporation. Oldham & Dowling, Reginald S. Kramer…
-
Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 1997 · in the opinion
Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997)
… T & N, PLC; Union Carbide Corp.; and United States Gypsum Co. All of the CCR petitioners stopped manufacturing asbestos products around 1975. \[3\] It is basic to comprehension of this proceeding to notice that no transferred…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)
…Inc., Quigley Company, Inc., Shook & Fletcher Insulation Company, T & N plc, Union Carbide Chemicals and Plastics Corp., United States Gypsum Company. \[4\] For example, on or about February 25, 1994, Vincent and Georgia Betty Greco, members…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion
Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…contractors who scored, snapped, sanded and installed asbestos-containing floor tiles. Roger Sahm: (Deceased Mesothelioma) Exposed to asbestos while working as a union carpenter and building maintenance from 1957-2001. Replaced asbestos containing tiles, repaired building…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion
Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)
…further, than to give to the judgment of another State, the same conclusive effect, and obligatory force in every State in the Union, that it had in the State where it was rendered." 7 G. & J…
-
Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion
District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)
…of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…