No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 26, 2023

    Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    …shares of fault of those released parties if their fault is proven at trial. The plaintiffs said the releases covered only asbestosis, were too general, and were inadmissible. The court found the releases authenticated and admissible…

  2. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · December 31, 2007 · in the opinion

    Penn v. A-Best Prods. Co. (2007)

    …Rimmel, for appellee Mobil Corporation. Oldham & Dowling, Reginald S. Kramer, and Terri L. Nass, for appellees General Electric Company and CBS Corporation. Trenz, McKay & Knabe Co., LPA, and Tim McKay, for appellee R.E. Kramig. Tucker…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Johnson v. ArvinMeritor, Inc. (2017)

    …trucks during the relevant time period." (Italics added.) To support this argument, Johnson relies heavily on a footnote in a recent Supreme Court opinion, Webb v. Special Electric Co., Inc. (2016) 63 Cal.4th 167, 193…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020

    Graul v. Tecumseh Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims against Tecumseh; the plaintiffs lost as to Tecumseh. New York courts lacked general jurisdiction over a corporation incorporated and headquartered in Michigan, and lacked specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a…

  5. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)

    The general rule should be that in cases where a plaintiff could easily have joined in the earlier action or where, either for the reasons discussed above or for other reasons, the application of offensive estoppel…

  6. Court case · U.S. Supreme Court · June 25, 1997 · in the opinion

    Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor (1997)

    "But the settlement does more than simply provide a general recovery fund," the Court of Appeals immediately added; "\[r\]ather, it makes important judgments on how recovery is to be allocated among different kinds of plaintiffs…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 1, 2019

    Matter of Marzigliano v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2019)

    …judgment dismissing plaintiffs' complaint and all cross-claims, finding fact issues on general and specific causation. A defendant cannot win summary judgment by pointing to gaps in plaintiffs' proof; it must make a prima facie showing…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)

    …requirements of predominance and superiority. In In re General Motors Corp. Pick-Up Truck Fuel Tank Products Liability Litigation, 55 F.3d 768 (3d Cir.) \[Hereinafter GM Trucks\], cert. denied sub nom. General Motors Corp. v…

  9. Court case · Wisconsin Supreme Court · October 27, 1999 · in the opinion

    Sopha v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1999)

    …Wisconsin would not turn a deaf ear to argument that in a particular sort of case the policy reasons [\236] for allowing an exception override the policy reasons for applying the general rule. 236 Patzer v…

  10. Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 30, 2010 · in the opinion

    Russell v. Ford Motor Company (2010)

    …if not all, of the cars he worked on were made by Ford, General Motors or Chrysler. As part of his duties, he used an air compressor to blow the dirt off the outside of the…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Aquitato v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS, INC. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2017)

    …Mass toxic tort cases, including asbestos cases, may be consolidated if they meet the requirements of the general rule governing consolidation of cases (In re Asbestos Litigation, 173 F.R.D.81, 38 Fed.R.Serv…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · September 21, 1994 · in the opinion

    Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1994)

    …I. Bressman, Budd, Larner, Gross, Rosenbaum, Greenberg and Sade, P.C., Cherry Hill, NJ, for General Reinsurance Corp., etal., third-party defendants. Michael J. Geraghty, Sean R. Kelly, David D'Aloia, Saiber, Schlesinger, Satz & Goldstein, Newark…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 6, 2020 · in the opinion

    Schrank v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2020)

    …increased risk for lung cancer among vehicle mechanics. This is with the caveat that since smoking rates amongst vehicle mechanics are much higher compared to the general population, studies that do no account for the effect…

  14. Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · January 12, 2009 · in the opinion

    Polanco v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2009)

    …However, it was a matter of general knowledge from the 1960s onward that prolonged exposure to airborne asbestos could possibly be harmful." Affidavit of Dr. Edwin Holstein stating that asbestos fibers are potentially dangerous to the…