6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · February 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Condon v. Advance Thermal Hydronics, Inc. (2018)
…KENT HOLDINGS, INC., f/k/a Dunham Busch, Inc., as successor-in-interest to Iron Fireman Combustion Products; FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC; GOULDS PUMPS INCORPORATED; HERCULES, INC.; HOLLINGSWORTH & VOSE COMPANY;…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · June 20, 2002 · in the opinion
Gutteridge v. AP Green Services, Inc. (2002)
…2d 1071 (2001). ¶ 28 Pennsylvania law imposes no general duty on property owners to prepare and maintain a safe building for the benefit of a contractor's employees who are working on that building. Mentzer v…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 4, 2023
Shellenberger v. Kreider Farms (2023)
…Failure to Warn; Premises Owner Liability; Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Kreider Farms dairy processing plant general manager of dairy plant operations Kreider Farms dairy processing plant 1972-1980
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 2, 2017 · in the opinion
DeLOOF v. Ace Hardware Corp. (2017)
…material fact, such as judicial admissions by respondent. In sum, because there was no factual basis for appellants' general assertion of causation, "\the conclusion is unavoidable that summary judgment was properly granted.'" (Saelzler, supra, 25 Cal…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · September 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2013)
…reports in asbestos cases must contain a discussion of the methodology supporting the expert opinion. There are enough nuances pertaining to this subject that we are unable to make such a general pronouncement here. We recognize…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Howard v. AW Chesterton Co. (2011)
…articles in an attempt to support their claims that respirable fibers were present. However much of this information is irrelevant to this case in general and ACE specifically. The simple fact remains that \[Appellants'\] attempt to…