14 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 18, 2015 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2015)
…in the business of selling such a product, and (b) it is expected to and does reach the user or consumer without substantial change in the condition in which it is sold. In Owens-Illinois, Inc…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · October 3, 2014 · in the opinion
May v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…both by Wood and by the out-of-state cases that have followed in its wake, the Mays make a series of miscellaneous arguments. We reject each of them. First, citing Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Zenobia…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · January 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2021)
Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the plaintiffs showed evidence of frequent and regular exposure where they were exposed to asbestos dust on a daily basis…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…answers are referenced in this opinion as coming from Firestone, since that is where Mr. Finch worked. \[2\] Kaylo is a form of pipe insulation that Owens-Corning manufactured. Docs. 306-7 at 84; 317-1…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 23, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…On August 18, 1972, Defendant wrote to Duke Power to confirm that Covil would use "Owens Corning Asbestos Free Calcium Silicate Pipe Covering and Block for the ducts, feed water heaters, and piping where Thermobestos was…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · April 27, 2021 · in the opinion
Connor v. Covil Corporation (2021)
…For instance, Appellant cites Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, where we affirmed the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs on the issue of causation. See 69 F.3d at 716…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion
Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)
…plaintiff "must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · December 11, 2018 · in the opinion
Connor v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company (2018)
…a personal injury asbestos case \\[to\] prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold \[the defendant\] liable." Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · March 22, 2021 · in the opinion
McDaniel v. John Crane, Inc. (2021)
…must present \evidence of exposure to a specific product on a regular basis over some extended period of time in proximity to where the plaintiff worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of South Carolina · October 26, 2020 · in the opinion
Robertson v. Air & Liquid Systems Corp. (2020)
…179, 644 S.E.2d 724 (2007) (adopting the Lohrmann test for actionable exposure in South Carolina); Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying the Lohrmann test in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Vinson v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 16, 2021 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · July 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Covil Corporation EX rel. Protopapas v. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company (2024)
…owned by or rented to the named insured." The exclusion thus contemplates a situation where the insured manufactures or distributes products at a facility it owns or rents and the injury occurs away from that facility…