No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

25 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 22, 2010 · in the opinion

    Whitmire v. Ingersoll-Rand Company (2010)

    Such evidence is simply not "of sufficient weight to support a reasonable inference of causation." (Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650, 656; see also McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., supra…

  2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · September 28, 2005 · in the opinion

    Lindstrom v. AC Product Liability Trust (2005)

    …the premises of plaintiff's workplace insufficient for liability to attach to defendant); Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156, 1162 (4th Cir. 1986) (same); Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Co., 726 F. Supp…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Hayes v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …loss, liability or damage for a period of two years. An exhibit to the agreement showed that "the Corporation" had received a subpoena duces tecum in a lawsuit against Owens-Corning Fiberglass, among other defendants, that…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 7, 2014 · in the opinion

    Logan v. Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (2014)

    …time in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked.'" Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. & Amchem Prods., Inc., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (applying Lohrmann v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp., 782 F.2d 1156…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …S. 121, 124-26, 129-35 (1989); Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court analyzes the requirements and determines that the Contractor Defendants satisfy each. A. Corporate…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 2, 2017 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Placid Oil Company (2017)

    …Rubber & Gasket settled with Plaintiffs does not meet Ingersoll-Rand's burden of proof As noted by the trial court, the appellate court in Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 03-248, p.14 (La.App…

  7. Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 2, 2009 · in the opinion

    Wangen v. Gardner Denver, Inc. (2009)

    …other factors. But the same court also cited with approval the Hansen v. Owens\[-Corning Fiberglas Corp.\] (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753, deferring to that court's opinion in the context of asbestos litigation. The…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 2, 2014 · in the opinion

    McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)

    …week ending September 6, 1970, it reported that "Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp. arrived on the job under their contract to supply and install all piping and machinery insulation and to install boiler insulation." Dkt. 32-22…

  10. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion

    Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)

    …statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 14, 2019 · in the opinion

    Walker v. Blackmer Pump Co. (2019)

    …Owens testified that Decedent probably worked on every electrical system on the U.S.S. Plymouth Rock. Further, Mr. Owens stated that Decedent spent roughly fifty-percent of his two-years aboard the U.S.S…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)

    …by E. John Litchfield, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC, Kathy L. Torregano, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC & Michael J. Marsiglia, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC. Owens Illinois, Inc, Cross Defendant, represented by Walter G. Watkins, III, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP, Elizabeth Riddell…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Aylward v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2022)

    …FMC CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULD PUMPS LLC, ITT LLC., KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, NAVISTAR, INC., A/K/A INTERNATIONAL, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), RILEY POWER INC, THE FAIRBANKS COMPANY, U.S. RUBBER…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion

    Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)

    …the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion

    Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)

    …a showing that plaintiff's "particular asbestos disease is cumulative in nature" which can be satisfied by establishing that "a series of exposures was a \legal cause' of \[plaintiff's\] injury." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)

    …that the California Supreme Court has not yet determined whether an "every exposure" theory of liability is consistent with the substantial factor test that applies in asbestos cases. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal…

  18. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)

    In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015

    Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)

    …because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021

    Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)

    …factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…