18 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion
Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)
…by E. John Litchfield, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC, Kathy L. Torregano, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC & Michael J. Marsiglia, Berrigan & Litchfield, LLC. Owens Illinois, Inc, Cross Defendant, represented by Walter G. Watkins, III, Forman, Watkins, & Krutz, LLP, Elizabeth Riddell…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 18, 2019 · in the opinion
Rodrigue v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2019)
…for summary judgment, plaintiffs have either moved to dismiss or settled with the following defendants which were party to the Joint Defendants' motion: FMC Corporation,\[20\] Ingersoll-Rand Company,\[21\] McCarty Corporation,\[22\] Owens-Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion
Aylward v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2022)
…FMC CORPORATION, GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULD PUMPS LLC, ITT LLC., KEELER-DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY, NAVISTAR, INC., A/K/A INTERNATIONAL, OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), RILEY POWER INC, THE FAIRBANKS COMPANY, U.S. RUBBER…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · January 25, 2012 · in the opinion
Rabovsky v. Goulds Pumps (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2012)
…the ability to establish specific testing relating to a particular plaintiff is exceedingly problematic. See, e.g. Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, 941 P.2d 1203, 16 Cal. 4th 953, 957 (Ca.1997).\[5\] It is clear…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 11, 2022 · in the opinion
Shelton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2022)
…a showing that plaintiff's "particular asbestos disease is cumulative in nature" which can be satisfied by establishing that "a series of exposures was a \legal cause' of \[plaintiff's\] injury." Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Colorado · March 19, 2019 · in the opinion
Mestas v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2019)
…A trial is the appropriate means to determine what obligations, if any, each Defendant owes to Plaintiffs, and Plaintiffs have not shown that they cannot obtain complete relief from any Defendant without the absent parties. Second…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · September 2, 2014 · in the opinion
McMann v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
Moreover, the insulation contract, which was given to Owens Corning, was awarded in August of 1970. Owens Corning employees arrived on the job site in the week ending September 6, 1970. Aside from Plaintiff's testimony…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 28, 2022 · in the opinion
Sampey v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2022)
…When there are multiple causes of injury, "a defendant's conduct is a cause in fact if it is a substantial factor generating plaintiff's harm." Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · August 11, 2021 · in the opinion
Hayes v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…loss, liability or damage for a period of two years. An exhibit to the agreement showed that "the Corporation" had received a subpoena duces tecum in a lawsuit against Owens-Corning Fiberglass, among other defendants, that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 29, 2014 · in the opinion
Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2014)
…S. 121, 124-26, 129-35 (1989); Feidt v. Owens Corning Fiberglas Corp., 153 F.3d 124, 127 (3d Cir. 1998). The Court analyzes the requirements and determines that the Contractor Defendants satisfy each. A. Corporate…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · May 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Whitehead v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…plaintiff "\must prove more than a casual or minimum contact with the product' containing asbestos in order to hold the manufacturer of that product liable." See Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 26, 2015
Hammell v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2015)
…because of disputed facts. Under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for, and owes no duty to warn about, asbestos-containing parts it did not manufacture or supply, and a plaintiff must show exposure to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · August 5, 2021
Wineland v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2021)
…factor, with evidence of the amount and duration of exposure. A manufacturer owes a duty to warn about third-party replacement parts only if its product requires the part to function as intended. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion
Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)
…Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Montell v. Viking Pump (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion
Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)
…Jan. 12, 2015) (court order). \[12\] Owen v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R. Co., 153 Wash.2d 780, 787, 108 P.3d 1220 (2005). \[13\] Owen, 153 Wash.2d at 787, 108 P.3d 1220…