5 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · June 8, 2006
United States v. Grace (2006)
…the government had known enough by 1992 to charge. The court denied the motion. It found the defendants had described the lost testimony only in general, speculative terms. In several instances the testimony would likely have…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · March 3, 2006 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace (2006)
…upon the history of the registration process, which the Court interpreted to include a general understanding that registration was a discrete act to be completed on a designated date, and that failure to so comply at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 24, 2006 · in the opinion
US v. Grace (2006)
…EPA. The Government alleges that Defendants Stringer and EPA made the following misleading statements in their CERCLA 104(e) response: that W.R. GRACE did not provide vermiculite to the general public; that W.R. GRACE…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion
US v. Grace (2005)
…to an EPA CERCLA 104(e) Request for Information, to wit: that W.R. GRACE did not provide vermiculite to the general public; that W.R. GRACE employees did not regularly leave the mine with tremolite…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · January 11, 2005 · in the opinion
US v. WR Grace (2005)
…In this case, Dr. Bronson opines that the individual Defendants are prejudiced by pretrial publicity despite their general lack of name recognition because jurors will impute Grace's conduct to the individual Defendants. Dr. Bronson calls…