6 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 28, 2020 · in the opinion
Brock v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2020)
…Delaware Corporation & GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendants, represented by JENNIFER M. TECHMAN, EVERT WEATHERSBY HOUFF. CLEAVER-BROOKS, INC., formerly known as CLEAVER-BROOKS DIVISION, ERICSSON INC., successor-in-interest to ANACONDA WIRE & CABLE CO., GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · March 23, 2011 · in the opinion
Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. v. Saville (2011)
…money must be used to pay claims, that general liability under the Joint Tort-feasors Act is established by the fact of the creation of the Trust and payment of settlement. We disagree. Under the Act…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · January 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Estate of Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2014)
…review and publication; 3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and 4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community." United States v. Hankey, 203 F…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit · November 16, 2012 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJohnson, Inc. (2012)
…recognize an impeachment exception to the collateral source rule, but relied only on the "well-established" general rule. Because there appear to be good grounds to recognize an impeachment exception to the Washington collateral source rule…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · February 12, 2018 · in the opinion
Barabin v. Scapa Dryer Fabrics, Inc. (2018)
…review and publication; (3) the known or potential error rate of the theory or technique; and (4) whether the theory or technique enjoys general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. See Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharm…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · June 30, 2014 · in the opinion
Barabin v. AstenJOHNSON, Inc. (2014)
…34); Gould MTD (Dkt. \# 36).) II. ANALYSIS A. Removal Jurisdiction In general, a defendant may remove to federal court any state action over which a district court would have original jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. …