10 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…Shannon, John Thomas, Garlock, Johns Manville and Owens Illinois. Under LSA-C.C.P. art. 1812, the trial court has wide discretion both in determining whether to use special interrogatories and in framing the questions to…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 20, 2006 · in the opinion
Chaisson v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2006)
…Therefore, the foreseeability reasoning used by the Texas Court of Appeals is inapplicable. 183 The Supreme Court of New Jersey unanimously found a duty to protect from household asbestos exposure in Olivo v. Owens-Illinois, Inc.…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · March 12, 2003 · in the opinion
Breaux v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…Inc.; Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp; Kelly Moore Paint Company; Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.; Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing; North American Refractories Co.; Owens-Illinois, Inc.; Proko Industries; Quigley Company; Riley Stoker Corp.; The Synkoloid Company; T…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)
…suit at this point, the claim would have been premature. Id. at 965 (emphasis supplied). This conclusion regarding prematurity is in accord with an earlier Mississippi case, Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards, 573 So.2d 704…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · December 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…in the Law 1993-1994, 55 La. L.Rev. 657, 658 (1995); Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); Faraldo v. Hanover Ins. Co., 600 So.2d 81…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and Avondale—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…