11 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)
…including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…Shannon, John Thomas, Garlock, Johns Manville and Owens Illinois. Under LSA-C.C.P. art. 1812, the trial court has wide discretion both in determining whether to use special interrogatories and in framing the questions to…
-
Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · September 14, 1987 · in the opinion
Zurich Insurance Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1987)
…INC., Appellee and Cross-Appellant. Nos. 63886, 63910, 63916 cons. Opinion filed September 14, 1987. Supreme Court of Illinois. [\24] [\25] [\26] Peter C. John and Mary Patricia Benz, of Phelan, Pope & John, Ltd., of Chicago…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · May 27, 1986
Zurich Ins. Co. v. Raymark Industries, Inc. (1986)
…but not by the intervening period; each triggered insurer owes full indemnity and defense to the insured, and the duty to defend ends when policy limits are exhausted by payment of judgments or settlements. Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · December 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…in the Law 1993-1994, 55 La. L.Rev. 657, 658 (1995); Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); Faraldo v. Hanover Ins. Co., 600 So.2d 81…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2003)
…claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and Avondale—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…