12 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · February 2, 2016 · in the opinion
Weis v. Dsm Copolymer, Inc. (2016)
…is improper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1442(a)(2). See Faulk v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 48 F.Supp.2d 653, 670 (E.D.Tex.1999). Accordingly, the court will focus its analysis of…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 19, 2014 · in the opinion
Luna v. AW Chesterton Company (2014)
…at 334. Evidence of the mere physical presence of asbestos-containing material is insufficient to find a manufacturer liable to a plaintiff. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2003-0248 (La.App. 1st Cir. 4/2…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · December 3, 2003 · in the opinion
Landry v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2003)
…in the Law 1993-1994, 55 La. L.Rev. 657, 658 (1995); Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788 (La.App. 4 Cir.1984); Faraldo v. Hanover Ins. Co., 600 So.2d 81…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 2, 2017
Savoie v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Co. (2017)
Joseph Savoie sued in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at the Avondale shipyard (now Huntington Ingalls) in various positions from about 1948 to 1996. He said he was exposed daily at the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · Louisiana Supreme Court · November 29, 2005 · in the opinion
Cichirillo v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2005)
…suit at this point, the claim would have been premature. Id. at 965 (emphasis supplied). This conclusion regarding prematurity is in accord with an earlier Mississippi case, Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. Edwards, 573 So.2d 704…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 24, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs (and Avondale)—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · October 31, 2022 · in the opinion
Reulet v. Lamorak Ins. Co. (2022)
…a). In making this assessment, the Court must view all evidence and make all reasonable inferences in the light most favorable to Plaintiffs and Avondale—the non-moving parties. Owens v. Circassia Pharms., Inc., 33 F…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · November 17, 2016 · in the opinion
Loupe v. Pennsylvania General Insurance Company (2016)
…C. & Rebecca Abbott Zotti, Frilot L.L.C.. Uniroyal, Inc., Defendant, represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC. Owens-Illinois, Inc., represented by Forrest Ren Wilkes, Cosmich Simmons & Brown, PLLC, Walter G. Watkins, III…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 30, 2017
Sheppard v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (2017)
…a workers' compensation insurer that inspects its insured's workplace owes no duty to the insured's employees for workplace safety where the policy language permits but does not require inspections and disclaims any undertaking for…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · July 26, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…2:17-CV-12367. Before: JOLLY, OWEN, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM.\[\\] This case is the latest in an ever-increasing line of cases brought by former Huntington Ingalls employees or their family members in…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 19, 2018 · in the opinion
Melancon v. Lamorak Insurance Company (2018)
…F.3d at 173). Remand is proper when defendants can show only that the government owns the relevant vessels and fails to produce evidence that the government distributed safety procedures regarding use of asbestos. See Bartel…