No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

16 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 21, 2011

    Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2011)

    Four consolidated asbestos cases in the federal MDL-875 docket involved Navy-related mesothelioma. Robert Conner, James Prange and James Stone served aboard Navy ships, working with engine rooms, fire rooms and boilers. Hiram Peavy worked as a…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    Renato Pizarro and his wife sued NASSCO, Pep Boys and other companies, alleging his mesothelioma came from asbestos exposure. The opinion describes two sources. One was the Navy overhaul of the USS Bristol County, where plaintiffs say NASSCO removed…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    Darlene Data sued many companies in her own right and as executrix of her husband Michael Data's estate. Mr. Data served in the Navy aboard the USS Newport News from 1969 to 1973. He later worked at Mesta Machine and then at the West Pittsburgh…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · July 28, 2016 · in the opinion

    Hillyer v. ABB (In re Asbestos Litigation Hillyer, 2016)

    …Shawn Edward Martyniak, Swartz Campbell LLC. Eaton Corporation, Cross Defendant, represented by Joseph S. Naylor, Swartz Campbell LLC. General Electric Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Beth E. Valocchi, Swartz Campbell LLC. Gould Electronics Inc., Cross Defendant…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)

    …24 (Crane); 84:6-24 (same). He was able to recall only the brands Westinghouse and General Electric without prompting. Choate was prompted to describe certain elements of the products he recalled, such as their label…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · February 11, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GENUINE PARTS COMPANY, GOULD ELECTRONICS, INC., GREENE TWEED & COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, LLC, GRINNELL, LLC, GUARD LINE…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  8. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · May 22, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …Rule 15(a)\] is exemplified' by the words \and leave shall be freely given when justice so requires.'" Harodite Industries, Inc. v. Warren Electric Corp., 24 A.3d 514, 530 (R.I. 2011) (quoting Medeiros v…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · April 21, 2017

    MacCormack v. the Adel Wiggins Group (2017)

    …on reconsideration, found it lacked general or specific personal jurisdiction over CBS in Missouri, a loss for the plaintiffs. Missouri's foreign corporation registration statute does not constitute consent to general personal jurisdiction, per State ex…

  10. Court case · Arizona Supreme Court · August 21, 2013 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2013)

    …light of § 175's comment (a), which states that "the law applicable to wrongful death is selected by the same principles as control selection of the law applicable to personal injuries in general (see § 146)." ¶ 20…

  11. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …Technologies, L.L.C. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Garlock, Inc.); General Motors Corporation (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Harrison Thermal System and Harrison Radiator); Goulds Pumps, Inc.; Hardie-Tynes…

  12. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)

    …1971) ("The fact ... that one of the parties is domiciled ... in a given state will usually carry little weight of itself."); Ferren v. General Motors Corp., 137 N.H. 423, 427, 628 A.2d 265 (1993…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 5, 2009 · in the opinion

    Anderson v. Bondex Int'l (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2009)

    …address the standards pertaining to relation back, and then proceed to apply those standards to the case before us. Relation Back in General Relation back is governed by Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(c) which provides…

  14. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …recognizing that "evidence of settlement negotiations is generally inadmissible under \[Rule 408\] as irrelevant and contrary to public policy"). However, the discoverability of settlement information is governed by our state's general discovery rule, Super. R…

  15. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …product; (2) on a regular basis; (3) over an extended period of time; and (4) in proximity to where the plaintiff actually worked." Chavers v. General Motors Corp., 79 S.W.3d 361, 368 (Ark. 2002)…

  16. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

    …911 (Mass. App. Ct. 1987) (reasoning that a worsening of a condition did not justify a subsequent new action as "\[t\]he general rule is, of course, that a plaintiff the "identity of issues" factor. 8…