No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”

  1. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · June 13, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …289 P.3d at 195; see Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 861 (Iowa 1994) (finding that "it is not necessary and indeed may be impossible to establish exactly how much…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · February 19, 2015 · in the opinion

    Bray v. Ingersoll-Rand Co. (2015)

    … Chavez v. Noble Drilling Corp., 567 F.2d 287, 289 (5th Cir. 1978); Sheffield v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 595 So. 2d 443, 450 (Ala. 1992) (citing Restatement (Second) of Torts § 433b, comment a). \[5\] Defendant…

  3. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · March 3, 2014 · in the opinion

    Farrow v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2014)

    …the meaning of the rule. See Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 4 [\867] F.3d 276, 282 (4th Cir.1993); O'Banion v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 968 F.2d 1011, 1015 (10th Cir.1992…

  4. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · July 15, 2013 · in the opinion

    Sweredoski v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2013)

    …at 548, 217 A.2d at 675; see also Spaur v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 510 N.W.2d 854, 863 (Iowa 1994) (quoting In re Joint Eastern and Southern District Asbestos Litigation, 129 B.R…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…

  6. Court case · Arizona Court of Appeals · April 17, 2012 · in the opinion

    Pounders v. Enserch E & C, Inc. (2012)

    …Beazer East, Inc., 219 Mich.App. 405, 557 N.W.2d 127, 132 (1996) (rejecting plaintiff's argument that entity that designed, manufactured, and installed coke ovens was a "supplier" for purposes of statute of repose).