No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

61 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 4

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · June 29, 2012

    Dixon v. Ford Motor Company (2012)

    The Court of Special Appeals vacated the judgments for the Dixon plaintiffs against Ford Motor Company and remanded for a new trial, because the trial court should not have admitted the plaintiffs' expert's causation opinion…

  2. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002

    Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)

    The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…

  3. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 29, 2010

    Asbury v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)

    Carlie Asbury, diagnosed with mesothelioma in 2006, and her husband Thomas sued thirty defendants in Rhode Island Superior Court in 2007. They alleged she was exposed to asbestos in Iowa, Colorado and Wyoming. In Iowa she swept dust and debris in…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida · July 11, 2016

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2016)

    The court denied Ford's motion for summary judgment and its motion to exclude Plaintiffs' causation experts and historian, denied Plaintiffs' motion to exclude Ford's experts (while barring untimely expert analysis), and denied Plaintiffs' motion…

  5. Court case · Pennsylvania Supreme Court · May 23, 2012 · in the opinion

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2012)

    Indeed, Appellant Ford Motor Company reads the responsive expressions of members of this Court in two recent decisions as recognizing that the any-exposure opinion facially implicates the Frye test. See Summers, 606 Pa. at 318…

  6. Court case · Indiana Court of Appeals · November 6, 2001

    Allied Signal, Inc. v. Herring (2001)

    …Statute of Limitations; Statute of Repose; Wrongful Death and Survival; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Cummins Engine Company plant; Cummins Engine Company, Inc., Columbus employee of Cummins Engine Company Cummins Engine Company, Inc. Columbus 1942-1978

  7. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 30, 2010

    Betz v. Pneumo Abex LLC (2010)

    The Superior Court reversed the trial court's summary judgment for Allied Signal and Ford (and the other friction product defendants) and remanded, holding that the trial court wrongly granted the defendants' Frye motion excluding the…

  8. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit · August 23, 2018

    Waite v. Aii Acquisition Corp. (2018)

    James Waite lived in Massachusetts, where he was exposed to asbestos while renovating apartments in the late 1960s. The opinion says the joint compound he used contained asbestos mined and sold by Union Carbide. He moved to Florida in 1978,…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · October 31, 2008

    Kummer v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)

    The court denied Viacom's summary judgment motion because genuine factual disputes remained on causation, and granted Ford's and GM's unopposed motions, so Mrs. Kummer's claims against Viacom go forward. Under general maritime…

  10. Court case · South Carolina Supreme Court · April 30, 2007

    Henderson v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2007)

    James Henderson, a North Carolina resident, and his wife sued several manufacturers in South Carolina. They claimed he developed mesothelioma from asbestos-containing products he encountered working for many years as a boilermaker, pipefitter and…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 8, 2012

    Adler v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2012)

    Twenty-two plaintiffs, all represented by the same lawyers, sued more than eighty defendants in New York County for asbestos-related injuries or deaths. Seven had lung cancer, fourteen had pleural mesothelioma, and Glenda Vega had peritoneal…

  12. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 20, 2016 · in the opinion

    Seymoure v. AO Smith Water Products Company (2016)

    …CORPORATION, DANA COMPANIES, LLC, individually and as successor-in-interest to Victor Gaskets and Spicer Clutches, EASTERN EXPRESS, INC. (DISCOVERY ONLY), EASTERN FREIGHT WAYS, INC. (DISCOVERY ONLY), EATON CORPORATION, FISHER SCIENTIFIC COMPANY, LLC, FORD MOTOR COMPANY…

  13. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · October 11, 2024 · in the opinion

    Day v. 3M Company Inc. (2024)

    …Caterpillar, Inc., Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Eaton Corporation, Ford Motor Company, Gould Pumps, LLC, Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Morse TEC LLC f/k/a BorgWarner TEC, LLC as Successor-by-Merger to Borg-Warner Corporation, Sunbeam Products…

  14. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …are A.W. Chesterton Company; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Bayer CropScience, Inc.; Borg Warner Morse TEC, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Chattanooga, Inc.; CBS Corporation; CertainTeed Corporation; Crane Company; Ford Motor Company; Foster…

  15. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · October 15, 2021 · in the opinion

    Schneider Electric USA, Inc. v. Williams (2021)

    …Judge. This matter is on remand from the Kentucky Supreme Court instructing us to reconsider our prior Opinion in light of its recent decision in Sheets v. Ford Motor Company, 626 S.W.3d 594 (Ky…

  16. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)

    …Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought personal…

  17. Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · July 7, 2023 · in the opinion

    Williams v. Schneider Electric USA, Inc. (2023)

    …The Kentucky Supreme Court granted discretionary review and vacated the decision, as the Court had overruled Ervin Cable in Sheets v. Ford Motor Company, 626 S.W.3d 594 (Ky. 2021).\[2\] We were then ordered…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Louisiana · July 14, 2014 · in the opinion

    Davidson v. Georgia Pacific LLC (2014)

    …for the District of Utah, in two recent cases, Anderson v. Ford Motor Company, 950 F. Supp.2d 1217 (D. Utah 2013) and Smith v. Ford Motor Company, No. 2:08-630, 2013 WL 214378 (D…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · May 24, 2010 · in the opinion

    Larson v. Georgia Pacific (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation, 2010)

    …806 (\Admissibility decisions focus on the expert's method and reasoning; credibility decisions arise after admissibility has been determined.')." Pineda v. Ford Motor Company, 520 F.3d 237, 247 (3d Cir.2008). In evaluating whether a…

  20. Court case · Georgia Court of Appeals · March 20, 2012 · in the opinion

    Union Carbide Corporation v. Fields (2012)

    …Defendants appeal the trial court's ruling only with respect to the following 16 nonparty entities: Georgia Power Company ("Georgia Power"); Ford Motor Company ("Ford"); Genuine Parts Company ("Genuine Parts"); Chrysler LLC ("Chrysler"); General Motors ("GM")…