No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 6, 2020

    Schrank v. Amchem Prods., Inc. (2020)

    The trial court granted Ford Motor Company's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint and cross claims against Ford, finding the plaintiffs' experts failed to show specific causation. In a toxic tort asbestos case…

  2. Court case · Michigan Court of Appeals · January 13, 1998

    Beaudrie v. Anchor Packing Co. (1998)

    …exposure during his employment. The husbands had already received workers' compensation benefits from their employers (Detroit Edison, Ford and Johnson Controls), and a state dust disease fund had reimbursed part of those benefits. The employers and…

  3. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · June 11, 2002 · in the opinion

    Crane, Inc. v. Scribner (2002)

    …2d at 996. In adopting 1990 as the critical date when the cause of action arose, the court, though supposedly applying Grimshaw, essentially applied the manifestation test. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md. App…

  4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 28, 2001 · in the opinion

    Arnold v. Garlock, Inc. (2001)

    …related to a bankruptcy case is equitably remanded, it is not subject to federal appellate review on any basis. See Hawking v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 210 F.3d 540, 550 (5th Cir.2000); Sykes v…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · March 17, 1986 · in the opinion

    In re Moorenovich (1986)

    …not recover damages for negligently inflicted mental suffering, except in connection with recovery of damages for physical injury caused by the same negligent act." Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 401 A.2d 148, 153 (1979)…

  6. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · December 14, 2004 · in the opinion

    Rourke v. Amchem Products, Inc. (2004)

    …and holdings in these §1738 cases are entirely consistent with the pronouncements of the Supreme Court in Constitutional full faith and credit cases. See, for example, Ford v. Ford, 371 U.S. 187, 192, 83 S…