No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)

    The court denied the insurers' (National Union and American Home) motion on trigger of coverage, granted it on pro rata allocation, and granted it in part on completed operations aggregate limits, leaving fact questions on whether…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA. v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)

    National Union Fire Insurance Company and American Home Assurance Company, excess insurers of Porter Hayden Company, were in a coverage dispute with Porter Hayden in bankruptcy court. The dispute concerned asbestos claims resolved by the Porter…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)

    The court granted in part and denied in part the cross-motions for summary judgment: the Insurers (National Union and American Home) waived the voluntary obligation provision, but they may challenge the reasonableness of the Trust…

  4. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    Viking Pump and Warren Pumps bought pump businesses from Houdaille Industries and now face asbestos injury claims from the years Houdaille owned those businesses. They sued twenty excess insurers, who had sold Houdaille forty-five policies, to use…

  5. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Granite State Insurance Company 15) Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 16) Highlands Insurance Company 17) Insurance Company of North America 18) Lexington Insurance Company 19) National Surety Corporation 20) National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002

    Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)

    Yale University sued its liability and property insurers in Connecticut federal court, seeking a declaration that its policies covered what it spent to deal with lead and asbestos in buildings it owns. Several insurers moved for summary judgment.…

  7. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    Viking Pump and Warren Pumps make pumps. Both bought their businesses from Houdaille Industries in the 1980s and then faced asbestos personal injury claims from the period when Houdaille owned them. They sued the excess insurers that had sold…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)

    …asbestos-free fireproofing. Id. Mario & DiBono's work was not continuous, as it was interrupted by more than work stoppage for reasons including union issues, and Mario & DiBono's failure to abide by safety protocols. Id., …

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    US Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co. (2012)

    …California law, "\[o\]ther insurance clauses become relevant only where several insurers insure the same risk at the same level of coverage" (Dart Indus., Inc. v Commercial Union Ins. Co., 28 Cal 4th 1059, 1078 n…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)

    …Court has held that "\\[o\]ther insurance' clauses become relevant only where several insurers insure the same risk at the same level of coverage" (Dart Indus., Inc. v Commercial Union Ins. Co., 28 Cal 4th 1059…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Lac D'Amiante du Quebec v. American Home Assur. (1988)

    …8\] Note should be taken that the Supreme Court has narrowly interpreted what constitutes the "business of insurance" within the meaning of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. See, e.g., Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Pireno…