No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

13 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · August 28, 1996 · in the opinion

    Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. Garrett (1996)

    …analysis, and evaluation in the Construction Insulation Shop at a Union Carbide plant to resolve "unanswered health problems." Mr. Peele did not include Kaylo in the third of the three intervals of sampling because the first…

  2. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · August 29, 1990 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1990)

    …at 1061. The court granted the suppliers summary judgment based on the sophisticated user/bulk supplier defense on the basis of its findings that: Eastman and Union Carbide supplied in bulk, via railroad tank cars and…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · September 9, 2005

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh v. Porter Hayden Company (2005)

    The court denied the insurers' (National Union and American Home) motion on trigger of coverage, granted it on pro rata allocation, and granted it in part on completed operations aggregate limits, leaving fact questions on whether…

  4. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA. v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)

    National Union Fire Insurance Company and American Home Assurance Company, excess insurers of Porter Hayden Company, were in a coverage dispute with Porter Hayden in bankruptcy court. The dispute concerned asbestos claims resolved by the Porter…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · March 31, 2014

    National Union Fire Insurance Company OF Pittsburgh, PA v. Porter Hayden Company (2014)

    The court granted in part and denied in part the cross-motions for summary judgment: the Insurers (National Union and American Home) waived the voluntary obligation provision, but they may challenge the reasonableness of the Trust…

  6. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Granite State Insurance Company 15) Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company 16) Highlands Insurance Company 17) Insurance Company of North America 18) Lexington Insurance Company 19) National Surety Corporation 20) National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 28, 2017 · in the opinion

    American Home Assur. Co. v. Port Auth. of NY & NJ (2017)

    …asbestos-free fireproofing. Id. Mario & DiBono's work was not continuous, as it was interrupted by more than work stoppage for reasons including union issues, and Mario & DiBono's failure to abide by safety protocols. Id., …

  8. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · October 18, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Godwin (1995)

    …York at which Dr. Selikoff spoke.\[17\] At that conference, also attended by representatives of the Union, Zeller first learned of the health hazards to installers of asbestos in other forms as well. Liddell attended the…

  9. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · December 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Goss v. American Cyanamid Co. (1994)

    …incorporated general sales area includes Middlesex, northern Monmouth\[,\] Union and Eastern Somerset counties.... [\248] The American Cyanamid plant in which Goss and Patullo worked was located in Eastern Somerset county. A reasonable inference to be drawn…

  10. Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · April 27, 1995 · in the opinion

    ACandS, Inc. v. Asner (1995)

    …claimed for contribution against Owens-Illinois, Inc., GAF, Inc., Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, and Armstrong World Industries, Inc. At the close of appellees' case, and at the close of all the evidence, appellants' motions for judgment on…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)

    …Court has held that "\\[o\]ther insurance' clauses become relevant only where several insurers insure the same risk at the same level of coverage" (Dart Indus., Inc. v Commercial Union Ins. Co., 28 Cal 4th 1059…

  12. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · December 28, 1988 · in the opinion

    Lac D'Amiante du Quebec v. American Home Assur. (1988)

    …8\] Note should be taken that the Supreme Court has narrowly interpreted what constitutes the "business of insurance" within the meaning of the McCarran-Ferguson Act. See, e.g., Union Labor Life Ins. Co. v. Pireno…

  13. Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 10, 1992 · in the opinion

    Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc. v. Balbos (1992)

    …Aber, when calling on the Texas State Board of Health in April 1942. In a written report to Eagle, circulated to at least three persons in that corporation, the sales representative, referring to the article, said…