No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

19 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)

    …576 (Pa. Super. 2014) (upholding the trial court's decision to enter summary judgment because the plaintiff "failed to establish that \[General Electric (GE)\] products containing asbestos were present at the worksite" and, as such, the…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2020

    Luca v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …in an asbestos case by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise credibility issues that a court cannot resolve on motion papers. Causation; Expert Testimony…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 2020

    Luca v. Whittaker, Clark and Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …s proof; it must show its product could not have contributed to the illness. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…

  4. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020

    Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of State was valid for a dissolved foreign corporation that had been authorized in New York. It found no general jurisdiction. It found specific jurisdiction because Luca's exposure and injury occurred in New York from…

  5. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020

    Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …mistaken use of § 307 did not matter. It found no general jurisdiction but found specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) and (2), because Neslemur was headquartered and manufactured in New York when the exposure occurred.

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Branson v. American International Industries (2016)

    …defense: We are of opinion that the privilege is of such a nature that it must be asserted at latest before the expiration of the period allotted for entering a general appearance and challenging the merits…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 18, 2019 · in the opinion

    Germain v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Kansas · June 17, 2022 · in the opinion

    Dickenson v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2022)

    …BSI argues that there is neither general nor specific jurisdiction over BSI in Kansas because Plaintiff does not identify any purposeful activity of BSI specifically directed at Kansas and does not establish that his claims arise…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · March 30, 2020 · in the opinion

    Kirkwood v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2020)

    …avoid jurisdiction." In re Nazi Era Cases, 153 F. App'x at 823. While product line successor liability\[2\] is an exception to the general rule of successor non-liability, "no court, appears to have addressed ..…

  10. Court case · New York Supreme Court · November 1, 2018 · in the opinion

    Niemeyer v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. (Matter of New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2018)

    …ORDERED that the Defendant Colgate-Palmolive Company serve a copy of this Order with Notice of Entry on the Trial Support Clerk located in the General Clerk's Office (Room 119) and on the County Clerk…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 22, 2025 · in the opinion

    Biljetina v. Brenntag N. AM., Inc. (2025)

    …shall serve a copy of this order with notice of entry upon the Clerk of the Court (60 Centre Street, Room 141B) and the Clerk of the General Clerk's Office (60 Centre Street, Room 119)…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Oregon · December 28, 2023 · in the opinion

    Chatfield v. Brenntag North America, Inc. (2023)

    …joined." Id. (citation omitted). "A defendant invoking federal court diversity jurisdiction on the basis of fraudulent joinder bears a \heavy burden' since there is a \general presumption against \[finding\] fraudulent joinder.'" Id. (quoting Hunter v. Philip…

  13. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 8, 2020 · in the opinion

    Germain v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  14. Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Olson v. Brenntag N. AM. Inc. (2019)

    …357.) Thus, evidence that a defendant's conduct injured "nonparties can help to show that the conduct that harmed the plaintiff also posed a substantial risk of harm to the general public, and so was particularly…

  15. Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 6, 2024 · in the opinion

    Tippin v. 3M Co. (2024)

    …by the defendant, "that the toxin is capable of causing a particular illness (general causation) and that \[he\] was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)." Dyer v. Amchem Prods…

  16. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion

    Rothlein v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)

    …of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…

  17. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion

    Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)

    …to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion

    Simpson v. American International Industries (2023)

    …Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1262 n.9 (5th Cir. 1988). "There is an exception to this general rule, however. \Nominal' or \formal' parties need not join in the removal petition." Farias v. Bexar Cty. Bd…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 5, 2025 · in the opinion

    Gref v. American International Industries (2025)

    …party properly objects. Id. However, "\[w\]hen a party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error." Molefe v. KLM Royal Dutch…