16 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · April 10, 2024 · in the opinion
Fisher v. American International Industries (2024)
…576 (Pa. Super. 2014) (upholding the trial court's decision to enter summary judgment because the plaintiff "failed to establish that \[General Electric (GE)\] products containing asbestos were present at the worksite" and, as such, the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 19, 2020
Luca v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…in an asbestos case by pointing to gaps in the plaintiff's proof, and conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise credibility issues that a court cannot resolve on motion papers. Causation; Expert Testimony…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 27, 2020
Luca v. Whittaker, Clark and Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…s proof; it must show its product could not have contributed to the illness. Conflicting expert reports on general and specific causation raise fact issues that cannot be resolved on motion papers. Causation; Product Identification; Expert…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · April 9, 2020
Nemeth v. Brenntag N. Am. (2020)
…can support specific causation. Where the trial court effectively apportioned 0% to settling defendants who were left off the verdict sheet, General Obligations Law § 15-108 offsets are computed by the aggregate method. Causation; Product Identification…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 20, 2020
English v. Avon Prods., Inc. (2020)
…the New York court to dismiss the case for lack of personal jurisdiction. The court found it could not exercise general jurisdiction because Shulton was not incorporated or headquartered in New York. It found specific jurisdiction…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 14, 2020
Luca v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of State was valid for a dissolved foreign corporation that had been authorized in New York. It found no general jurisdiction. It found specific jurisdiction because Luca's exposure and injury occurred in New York from…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 28, 2020
Germain v. The Neslemur Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…mistaken use of § 307 did not matter. It found no general jurisdiction but found specific jurisdiction under CPLR 302(a)(1) and (2), because Neslemur was headquartered and manufactured in New York when the exposure occurred.
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · September 18, 2019 · in the opinion
Germain v. American Int'l Indus. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 8, 2020 · in the opinion
Germain v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · August 29, 2019 · in the opinion
Fishbain v. Colgate-Palmolive Company (2019)
…was exposed from 1964, when she was nine years old, through the late 1970s— caused her to develop mesothelioma.\[4\] In general terms, the complaint alleged WCD supplied asbestos-contaminated talc to Shulton, Shulton incorporated the…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 6, 2024 · in the opinion
Tippin v. 3M Co. (2024)
…by the defendant, "that the toxin is capable of causing a particular illness (general causation) and that \[he\] was exposed to sufficient levels of the toxin to cause the illness (specific causation)." Dyer v. Amchem Prods…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 13, 2020 · in the opinion
Rothlein v. Whittaker Clark & Daniels (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…of this Order with Notice of Entry pursuant to NYSCEF e-filing protocol on the remaining parties, the General Clerk's Office and the County Clerk's Office, who are directed to mark their records accordingly…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 18, 2018 · in the opinion
Vanhoy v. American International Industries (2018)
…to understate the hazards of asbestos exposure, all for their own profit and gain, Defendant \[Metropolitan Life Insurance Company\] willfully, wantonly, and with malice in calculated disregard for the welfare of the general public. . . . (Am. Compl…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Mississippi · March 13, 2023 · in the opinion
Simpson v. American International Industries (2023)
…Am., 841 F.2d 1254, 1262 n.9 (5th Cir. 1988). "There is an exception to this general rule, however. \Nominal' or \formal' parties need not join in the removal petition." Farias v. Bexar Cty. Bd…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · March 27, 2015 · in the opinion
Kaenzig v. Charles B. Chrystal Company, Inc. (2015)
…a result of his exposure to defendant's asbestos-contaminated talc through contact with his father. With regard to general causation, Moline explained that asbestos contains microscopic fibers that are easily inhaled deep into the lungs…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York · March 5, 2025 · in the opinion
Gref v. American International Industries (2025)
…party properly objects. Id. However, "\[w\]hen a party makes only conclusory or general objections, or simply reiterates the original arguments, the Court will review the Report strictly for clear error." Molefe v. KLM Royal Dutch…