- Organization: American Motorists Insurance Company
- Organization: Highlands Insurance Company
- Clear filters
6 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 5, 2000 · in the opinion
Brunet v. Avondale Industries, Inc. (2000)
…in that no reasonable finder of fact could determine from the evidence that Garlock, Inc., Uniroyal Inc., Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., Johns Manville Corp., Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., Owens-Illinois, Inc., Dr. John Konzen or Richard F…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 19, 2003 · in the opinion
Ewing v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (2003)
…claim were analyzed, the Louisiana Fourth Circuit Court of Appeal stated that "a cause of action arises when negligent or tortious conduct causes injury." Coates v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 444 So.2d 788, 790 (La…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · December 13, 1995 · in the opinion
Stonewall Ins. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Management (1995)
…including California, see Montrose Chemical, 10 Cal.4th 645, 42 Cal.Rptr.2d 324, 897 P.2d 1, New Jersey, see Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co., 138 N.J. 437, 650 A.2d 974…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion
US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)
…the reasons discussed below, we conclude that that cause should be characterized as the continuing process of the manufacture and sale of asbestos containing products. On point again is Owens-Illinois Inc. v. United Insurance Co…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…sued its liability and property insurers in Connecticut federal court, seeking a declaration that its policies covered what it spent to deal with lead and asbestos in buildings it owns. Several insurers moved for summary judgment…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 31, 1985
Lac D'Amiante Du Quebec v. Am. Home Assur. Co. (1985)
…injury or property damage that appears years after exposure or installation, and whether each triggered insurer owes the full loss or only a prorated share. It found the policy language ambiguous and construed it in favor…