No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

12 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · December 22, 1994 · in the opinion

    Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Ins. Co. (1994)

    …OF THE BRITISH WEST INDIES; OWENS INSURANCE LIMITED, A CORPORATION DULY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF BERMUDA; AND GENERAL REINSURANCE CORPORATION, A CORPORATION DULY ORGANIZED UNDER THE LAWS OF DELAWARE, DEFENDANTS- APPELLANTS, AND AMERICAN RISK MANAGEMENT…

  2. Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida · June 7, 1996 · in the opinion

    Matter of Celotex Corp. (1996)

    …Hatfield conducted a personal inspection of the building and described the overall condition of the Spraycraft in the building as fair.\[146\] The Spraycraft was installed primarily above suspended ceilings and in mechanical and electrical closets…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  4. Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion

    In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)

    As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…

  5. Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion

    Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)

    § 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…

  6. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…

  7. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion

    United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)

    …pay "all sums" up to the policy limit, which the insured shall become liable to pay as damages, and not just for damages that occur during the policy period (Aerojet-General Corp. v Transport Indem. Co.…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…

  9. Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 24, 2012 · in the opinion

    US Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co. (2012)

    …brevity, we presume familiarity with the case, and provide a general overview of the facts directly relevant to this appeal. The Underlying Asbestos Claims In the 1950s and 1960s, Western Asbestos was a company that sold…

  10. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · November 4, 1994 · in the opinion

    US Gypsum Co. v. Admiral Ins. Co. (1994)

    …coverage action when that proof has not yet been established in the underlying action. Courts have addressed these competing concerns by crafting the general rule that if an insured settles an underlying claim prior to verdict…

  11. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  12. Court case · New York Court of Appeals · February 7, 2013 · in the opinion

    Usf&g Co. v. American Re-Ins. (2013)

    …California Court of Appeal held in 1997 that MacArthur, though it was liable on claims made against Western Asbestos, did not succeed by operation of law to Western Asbestos's liability insurance (General Acc. Ins. Co…