No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

6 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · October 25, 2016

    Ballard v. Ameron International Corporation (2016)

    …part of the exposure. Enclave jurisdiction would also require all defendants to join the removal, and General Electric had said it did not consent. Ameron had made no showing for federal officer removal. The court also…

  2. Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 23, 2023 · in the opinion

    Horvath v. AW Chesterton Co. (2023)

    …VALVES INC., ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY, NORDSTROM VALVES INC. AND McANNA CORPORATION, FMC CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, GARDNER DENVER, INC., GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, GOULDS PUMPS, INCORPORATED, GREENE TWEED & CO. INC., GRINNELL LLC, HERCULES, LLC, IMO INDUSTRIES…

  3. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 24, 2020

    Schrader v. Ameron International Corporation (2020)

    …Schrader prevailed on that point. A trial court abuses its discretion when it denies a jury's specific request to view a duly admitted exhibit based only on a general preference and speculation about prolonged deliberations…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 17, 2015 · in the opinion

    Melendrez v. Ameron International Corporation (2015)

    In general, for the purposes of the causation requirement in workers' compensation, it is sufficient if the connection between work and the injury be a contributing cause of the injury. . . .' \[Citations.\]" (Id. at pp. 298-299…

  5. Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 17, 2000 · in the opinion

    Ashdown v. Ameron International Corp. (2000)

    …1982, the dual capacity exception to the general exclusivity of the workers' compensation remedy has been limited to the narrow factual circumstances presented where the employee's injury was caused by the employer's product, which…

  6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. \ \ \ Pa.R.C…