No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · July 7, 2022

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2022)

    The court granted General Electric and ViacomCBS's motion to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for punitive damages and loss of consortium damages under general maritime law, but denied it as to the California negligence and strict…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · July 25, 2018

    Kraus v. Alcatel-Lucent (2018)

    … Government Contractor Defense and Removal; Venue, Removal and Transfer Worksites: General Electric building, 32nd and Chestnut Streets; U.S.S. Cambria; General Electric; office building at 32nd and Chestnut Streets, Philadelphia electronics officer and subsequently communications…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · June 28, 2017

    Herman v. Ametek (In re Asbestos Products Liability Litigation (NO. VI), 2017)

    Maynard Herman and his wife Irene sued Ametek, Inc. and other companies in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas. They alleged that Mr. Herman's work exposed him to asbestos and that he developed mesothelioma. Defendants removed the case to federal…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · September 6, 2013 · in the opinion

    Lara v. CBS Corp. (2013)

    …2013. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL AUDREY B. COLLINS, District Judge. Proceedings: ORDER Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand (In Chambers) Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' Motion to Immediately Remand Plaintiffs…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · June 24, 2024 · in the opinion

    Marcus v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2024)

    …causation standard, and then arguing that the second "substantial factor" prong is not met). Only in its reply does Eaton raise doubts about Plaintiff's actual bystander exposure to its asbestos-containing electrical products. Dkt. No…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2023 · in the opinion

    Elorreaga v. Rockwell Automation, Inc. (2023)

    …reliability, the Court "assess\[es\] the \[expert's\] reasoning or methodology, using as appropriate such criteria as testability, publication in peer reviewed literature, and general acceptance." Id. at 564. III. DISCUSSION As an initial matter, the…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 7, 2016 · in the opinion

    Murphy v. Alcatel-Lucent USA Inc. (2016)

    …with a motion and proposed order to have the exceptions set for hearing, in state court. In general, "\[a\] waiver of the right to remove must be clear and unequivocal." Furthermore, as explained in Bourdier v…

  8. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · October 28, 2019 · in the opinion

    Kardos v. Armstrong Pumps, Inc. (2019)

    …Note: Rule 1035.2 sets forth the general principle that a motion for summary judgment is based on an evidentiary record which entitles the moving party to judgment as a matter of law. \ \ \ Pa.R.C…