No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

5 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · November 13, 2006 · in the opinion

    Bartel EX rel. Estate, Rich v. AC Prod. Liab. Tr. (2006)

    …Just after World War' H, Rich was a merchant seaman; he worked as an engineer and electrician on ships for five years from 1945-1950. In 1955, Rich began work as an engineer at a jet…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · March 31, 2009 · in the opinion

    Jackson v. AC Product Liability Trust (2009)

    …Executor from August 11, 1969 to December 2, 1969, Jackson held an entry-level position known as a wiper. His duties included general cleaning, washing down the engine room, mopping, chipping and painting (Tr. 377-78…

  3. Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 30, 2019 · in the opinion

    Lopez v. the Hillshire Brands Company (2019)

    …430, the more general instruction on substantial-factor causation: "A substantial factor in causing harm is a factor that a reasonable person would consider to have contributed to the harm. It must be more than a…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · December 28, 2007 · in the opinion

    Wille v. AC Product Liability Trust (2007)

    …210 and 211) are also denied. As a general statement, Plaintiffs have provided sufficient lay and/or expert testimony to establish a prima facie case of whether there was "sufficient exposure" to these products by Plaintiffs…

  5. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · January 17, 2001 · in the opinion

    Crooks v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. (2001)

    …principle of stare decisis, the civil law statutes and codes are usually drafted in more general terms than common-law statutes and thus depend more on judges to render them concrete through judicial interpretation. Id. The…