Search

• Organization: Armstrong Cork Co. ×
• Organization: Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. ×
• Clear filters

9 results for “Ford Motor Company”

1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 30, 1982 · in the opinion

   Murphree v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1982)

   …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

2. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit · December 7, 1983 · in the opinion

   Clay v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1983)

   …Supreme Court, with Justice William Fones dissenting, prevented the amendment from becoming effective. The Court held in Ford Motor Company v. Moulton, 511 S.W.2d 690 (Tenn.1974) that under Tennessee vested rights doctrine, based…

3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 22, 1986 · in the opinion

   Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1986)

   …722 F.2d 1238 (5th Cir.1984), modified and reh'g denied, 727 F.2d 350 (5th Cir.1984); Foster v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 1304, 1309 n. 10 (5th Cir.1980). We note…

4. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 21, 1985 · in the opinion

   Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1985)

   …Inc., 656 F.2d 1147, 1153 (5th Cir.1981); King v. Ford Motor Co., 597 F.2d 436, 445 (5th Cir.1979). We find no abuse of discretion on the part of the district court. Nothing…

5. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · March 23, 1984 · in the opinion

   Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1984)

   …protection to a rigidly literal class of "users and consumers." In Ford Motor Co. v. Cockrell, 211 So.2d 833 (Miss.1968), a city employee noticed smoke rising from the motor of an unattended city truck…

6. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion

   Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)

   …id., and "view trade relations realistically rather than mythically." Verge v. Ford Motor Co., 581 F.2d 384 (3rd Cir.1978). Thus in determining who may be "primarily responsible" [\125] and required to indemnify in a…

7. Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · June 7, 2011 · in the opinion

   Nye v. Bayer Cropscience, Inc. (2011)

   …S.W.3d 429, 452-53 (Tenn.Ct.App.2000); Harden v. Danek Med., Inc., 985 S.W.2d 449, 451 (Tenn.Ct.App.1998). North Brothers, relying on Ford Motor Co. v. Wagoner, 183 Tenn.

8. Court case · Maine Supreme Judicial Court · January 17, 1984 · in the opinion

   Austin v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc. (1984)

   …second, that such assumption of the risk is a "form of contributory negligence." The first principle finds wide support in the authorities. See Henderson v. Ford Motor Co., 519 S.W.2d 87, 90 (Tex.1974)…

9. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit · July 30, 1982 · in the opinion

   Wilson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp. (1982)

   …D. C., Kevin R. McCarthy for Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc., Washington, D. C., Francis J. Ford for Armstrong Cork Co., Washington, D. C., John Jude O'Donnell for Unarco Industries, Inc., Washington, D. C., and Paul…