10 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion
Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)
…of such a nature as to raise a reasonable inference that \[s\]he inhaled asbestos fibers that emanated from it.'" Wilson, 807 A.2d at 923 (quoting Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 1999 Pa. Super…
-
Court case · Tennessee Supreme Court · January 4, 2021 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2021)
…statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislative intent without unduly restricting or expanding a statute's coverage beyond its intended scope." Howard, 504 S.W.3d at 269 (quoting Owens v. State…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 19, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Asbestos, 2021)
…Dkt. No. 418 at 5. But Plaintiffs bear the burden of establishing that exposure to Defendants' products was a substantial factor causing his illness. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 982 (Cal…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · June 27, 1996 · in the opinion
Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc. (1996)
…IL, James D. Miller, King & Spalding, Washington, DC, Philip McWeeny, David L. Gray, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Toledo, Ohio, for Owens-Illinois, Inc.-Amicus Curiae. Robert G. Vial, Dallas, Texas, Gordon S. Rather, Jr., Little Rock, Arkansas…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · May 20, 2021 · in the opinion
Toy v. Armstrong Int'l (In re Toy Asbestos, 2021)
…exposed to asbestos from Defendant's products; and (2) this exposure was a substantial factor in causing Mr. Toy's injury and death. See Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal. 4th 953, 968-69 (Cal…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 18, 2007
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Company (2007)
…and sewer pipe in Pittsburgh. He later worked at the Anchor Hocking glass plant, where he was exposed to asbestos cement used to repair glass-annealing ovens (lehrs), to pipe covering, and to transite mill board…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 18, 2021 · in the opinion
Kriz v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2021)
In opposition to Armstrong's motion, Plaintiff argues that a product manufacturer like Armstrong owes innocent persons injured from its defective product, like decedent, a clear duty to warn under New York law, especially in "take…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · March 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Bugosh v. Allen Refractories Co. (2007)
…construction materials. Surface Combustion, Inc. provided glass ovens, termed lehrs at Anchor Hocking Glass Company. \[2\] Two other defendants listed on the verdict sheet settled, and are not involved in these appeals. \[3\] Mesothelioma, a cancer…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · February 1, 2012 · in the opinion
Conner v. Alfa Laval, Inc. (2012)
…now holds that, under maritime law, a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute.
-
Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · July 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Coffman v. Armstrong International, Inc. (2019)
…e have no basis to conclude in this diversity case that the Tennessee Supreme Court would overrule its prior decisions holding that a manufacturer owes no duty of care to consumers of products made by others…