No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

8 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · December 14, 2020 · in the opinion

    Adams v. Ethyl Corporation (2020)

    …Bougalusa, 506 So. 2d 719 (La. App. 1 Cir. 1987). It especially relies on Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. 13-6323, 2014 WL 4930457 (E.D. La. 2014). In Smith, the plaintiff was temporarily contracted…

  2. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · May 22, 1996 · in the opinion

    Egan v. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. (1996)

    …an industrial hygienist employed by Union Carbide, was introduced in evidence. Peele said that in 1961, after receiving complaints from a Union Carbide safety engineer about working conditions of workers cutting Kaylo block insulation with a…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 4, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gaddy v. Taylor Seidenbach, Inc. (2020)

    …180, in which the court held that a boiler insulated with asbestos did not constitute a vice or defect absent evidence that the asbestos was disturbed, and Smith v. Union Carbide Corp., No. Civ.A. 13…

  4. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · July 27, 1988

    Blazek v. Nicolet, Inc. (1988)

    …of Repose; Design Defect; Wrongful Death and Survival Worksites: Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) plant, Cicero; Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC), Cicero employee at UARC Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UARC) Cicero 1951-1952

  5. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 16, 1991

    Fibreboard Corp. v. Pool (1991)

    …the limitations defense, or the fault percentages. It held that a union poster was wrongly admitted but harmless. It found the evidence insufficient for Pool's $100,000 future medical award, so he must remit it…

  6. Court case · Illinois Supreme Court · October 25, 1983 · in the opinion

    Froud v. Celotex Corp. (1983)

    …11.) A "change in that construction by this court would amount to amending the statute," and this court has acknowledged that "\[t\]he power to accomplish this does not lie in the courts." Union Electric Co…

  7. Court case · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · August 24, 1989 · in the opinion

    District of Columbia v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation (1989)

    …of actions commenced by a state after a statute of limitations would ordinarily have run.\[11\] The District of Columbia, however, has never been admitted to the Union as a state. The District is, of course…

  8. Court case · Washington Supreme Court · April 27, 1989 · in the opinion

    Sofie v. Fibreboard Corp. (1989)

    …1966) (issue of damages, here primarily noneconomic, is within the jury's province); Power v. Union Pac. R.R., 655 [\647] F.2d 1380, 1388 (9th Cir.1981) (under Washington law, damages for loss of companionship…