6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · December 1, 2022
Pyle v. AH Bennett Co. (2022)
Brian Pyle and Glenn Frericks filed separate federal lawsuits in North Dakota against many companies, alleging state-law claims arising from their occupational exposure to asbestos. The opinion does not name their diseases or describe where they…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 28, 2011 · in the opinion
Buttitta v. Allied-Signal, Inc. (2011)
…BENDIX, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTD., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., RAYMARK INDUSTRIAL DIVISION, UNION CARBIDE CORP., and UNION INSULATING CO., Defendants, and ASBESTOS CORPORATION LTD., Defendant-Appellant. No. A-6117-09T4. Submitted May 25, 2011. Decided July…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)
…successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC. and BENDIX, LAKE ASBESTOS OF QUEBEC, LTC., MULTIC-HEVROLET, INC., NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., RAYMARK INDUSTRIAL DIVISION, UNION CARBIDE CORP., UNION…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)
…v., the Court must find as a matter of law that plaintiffs failed to advance sufficient facts to justify the verdict. Neville Chemical Co. v. Union Carbide Corp., 422 F.2d 1205 (3d Cir.), cert. denied…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · October 15, 2007 · in the opinion
Polanco v. Asbestos Corp., Inc. (2007)
…Sepco Corp. (Sealing Equip. Prod. Co., Inc.) 5/19/04 8/11/06 11/29/06\[\\\] Union Carbide Corp. 2/23/04 7/31/06 8/17/06 Uniroyal Holding, Inc. 5/15/03 Viacom, Inc…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 22, 2014
Genusa v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2014)
…state court, with only BRMC's claims against the Unions staying in federal court. Third-party claims that depend on interpreting collective bargaining agreements are completely preempted by LMRA Section 301 and support removal. The plaintiff…