29 results for “General Electric”, page 1 of 2
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · April 17, 2017
McClung v. 3M Company (2017)
The court severed the claims against General Electric and transferred them to the Southern District of West Virginia, granting General Electric's request and denying its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction as moot…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin · June 3, 2015
Spychalla v. Boeing Aerospace Operations Inc. (2015)
The district court denied summary judgment to Boeing, Cessna and General Electric, granted and denied the motions in limine in part, and allowed Boeing to file a late government contractor defense motion. The court did not…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · December 1, 2022
Pyle v. AH Bennett Co. (2022)
Brian Pyle and Glenn Frericks filed separate federal lawsuits in North Dakota against many companies, alleging state-law claims arising from their occupational exposure to asbestos. The opinion does not name their diseases or describe where they…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · February 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2011)
…known as VIACOM, Inc., formerly known as WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP.; CERTAIN-TEED CORP.; CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC.; DANA CORP.; CEERE & COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY; GARLOCK SEALING TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; GENERAL DYNAMICS CORP.; GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY; GEORGIA…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit · March 30, 2018 · in the opinion
Clark v. Aii Acquisition, LLC (2018)
…Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc., Defendants-Cross Defendants-Appellees, The Boeing Company, BorgWarner Morse Tec LLC, CBS Corporation, General Electric Company, Goodyear Canada, INC., Goodyear Tire and Rubber Company, Harco LLC, fka Harco Laboratories, Inc., Henkel Corporation…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · August 31, 1982 · in the opinion
Neal v. Carey Canadian Mines, Ltd. (1982)
…cite the cases of Toppi v. United States, 332 F.Supp. 513 (E.D.Pa.1971) and Lockett v. General Electric Co., 376 F.Supp. 1201 (E.D.Pa.1974), aff'd, 511 F.2d 1394 …
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Alabama · September 13, 2012 · in the opinion
Brown v. the Boeing Company (2012)
…under submission. DONE and ORDERED. \[1\] Plaintiff's complaint also named CBS Corporation (f/k/a Viacom, Inc.), DAP Products, Inc., General Electric Company, Georgia-Pacific LLC, Goodrich Corporation, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, RT Vanderbilt Company…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · June 18, 2020 · in the opinion
Kruse v. Actuant Corporation (2020)
… 3.) After his military service, Mr. Jimenez was "honorably discharged as the civilian equivalent of a Certified Aircraft Electrical Mechanic and Technician." (Id.) Apart from his service, Mr. Jimenez also "performed both supervisorial and hands-on…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · April 5, 2010 · in the opinion
Buttitta v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2010)
…CO., C.L. ZIMMERMAN of DELAWARE, a successor corporation to C.L. ZIMMERMAN COMPANY, GENERAL MOTORS CORP., HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a successor corporation to ALLIED-SIGNAL, INC., and as a successor in interest to HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of Louisiana · April 22, 2014 · in the opinion
Genusa v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2014)
…claims against various defendants arising out of alleged asbestos exposure at Avondale Shipyards. Some of the defendants brought a third-party contribution action against Westinghouse Electric Corporation, the manufacturer of marine turbines for the U.S…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 8, 2021
Carnes v. General Dynamics Corp. (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2021)
The magistrate judge recommended granting General Dynamics' motion for summary judgment against the Carnes plaintiffs because they produced no evidence that Mr. Carnes was exposed to an asbestos-containing product attributable to General Dynamics. Under Texas…
-
Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · July 28, 2011
Buttitta v. Allied-Signal, Inc. (2011)
…accept it can be held liable for the fee, cost and interest awards the rule provides. The award did not violate due process. Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: General Motors Corporation warehouse General Motors Corporation warehouse
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · June 28, 2021
Klick v. Asbestos Corporation, Ltd. (2021)
The court granted Boeing's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, finding no general or specific jurisdiction over Boeing in New Jersey, denied jurisdictional discovery, and declined to transfer the claims, so Boeing won…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · May 15, 2000
Hamilton v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (2000)
…Court reversed the Court of Appeal, holding that Mitchell's second action (for mesothelioma) was not time-barred and that Asbestos Corporation made a general appearance in the first action, so the plaintiffs prevailed on both…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · January 10, 2025 · in the opinion
Holste v. 3M Company (2025)
…cv-09814-JLS-E. January 10, 2025. United States District Court, C.D. California. CIVIL MINUTES — GENERAL JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge. (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO REMAND (Doc. 34) Before the Court is…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · January 3, 2008 · in the opinion
Hilbert v. McDonnell Douglas Corp. (2008)
…Co., 425 F.3d 689, 694 (9th Cir.2005); Lovern v. General Motors Corp., 121 F.3d 160, 162 (4th Cir. 1997). The challenge is determining how specific the pleadings must be to place the defendants…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of North Carolina · March 4, 1986 · in the opinion
Gardner v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1986)
…North Carolina applies to this action as to the other pending cases. All or most of the cases raise the question of the applicability of North Carolina General Statutes (N.C.G.S.) § 1-50(6)…
-
Court case · Washington Supreme Court · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion
Walston v. Boeing Company (2014)
…gross negligence, yet short of premeditated and deliberate harm). Our holding in Birklid interprets the intentional tort consistently with general tort principles while still keeping in mind the IIA's purpose of balancing competing interests. 127…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Ohio · November 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Adkins v. GAF Corp. (1988)
…sold by ACL is processed raw asbestos fiber. Asbestos exposure causes asbestosis. This fact was general knowledge in the asbestos industry in the State of Ohio at least after 1945. Not every exposure to asbestos, however…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · July 20, 1992 · in the opinion
Marinari v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd. (1992)
…TAMILIA, KELLY and JOHNSON, JJ. [\442] WIEAND, Judge: The general issue in this asbestos exposure action is whether Pennsylvania, in the context of asbestos actions, shall be a one-disease or two-disease state. More specifically…