No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

10 results for “Ford Motor Company”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · September 9, 2014

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    Joseph Anderson, Jr. sued in Utah state court, alleging he had asbestos-caused mesothelioma. The case was removed to federal court and transferred to the asbestos multidistrict litigation in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Mr. Anderson died of…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · June 24, 2013

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    …2008. His wife, Arva Anderson, the executor of his estate, took over the suit against several companies, including Crane Co. The case was removed to federal court, sent to the multidistrict litigation in Pennsylvania, and then…

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · February 28, 2014

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2014)

    Joseph Anderson Jr. sued in state court, and the case was removed to federal court in Utah. He alleged asbestos-caused mesothelioma and died of it in 2008. His wife Arva Anderson, as executor, took over as plaintiff. After the case returned from the…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Utah · July 1, 2013

    Anderson v. Ford Motor Company (2013)

    Joseph Anderson Jr. sued Ford Motor Company and other defendants over his mesothelioma. After he died on June 7, 2008, his wife and executor, Arva Anderson, took over as plaintiff. The opinion does not describe where…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · November 9, 2021 · in the opinion

    Data v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …INC., AND ROCKWELL MANUFACTURING COMPANY; FLOWSERVE US INC., SUCCESSOR TO VALTEK INTERNATIONAL; FLSMIDTH DORR-OLIVER, INC., AS SUCCESSOR-IN-INTEREST TO KEELER/DORR-OLIVER BOILER COMPANY; FLSMIDTH, INC., FMC CORPORATION, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER LLC…

  6. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2016)

    The rules of evidence do not permit an expert to testify that "\[j\]ust because we cannot rule anything out" that "we can rule everything in." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 08-630, 2013 WL…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …plaintiff's exposure. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 2016 WL 6876490, at [\8] (Pa. Nov. 22, 2016) (permitting expert opinion that "Rost's exposures to asbestos at Smith Motors were sufficiently frequent, regular, and proximate…

  9. Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 18, 2021 · in the opinion

    Phipps v. Copeland Corporation LLC (2021)

    …(Cf. Buell-Wilson v. Ford Motor Co. (2006) 141 Cal.App.4th 525, 553 \[jury's award of 13 times the amount counsel for plaintiffs requested in noneconomic damages and three times the amount requested for…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · July 18, 2016 · in the opinion

    Oliver v. Campbell McCORMICK, Inc. (2016)

    …Pump, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by F. Ford Loker, Jr., Miles and Stockbridge PC. Crane Co., ThirdParty Defendant, represented by Neil Joseph MacDonald, MacDonald Law Group, LLC. General Electric Company, ThirdParty Defendant, represented by David J. Quigg…