9 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits on reconsideration with late evidence) leave no reasonable possibility of reinstating the claim; the common-defense exception does not apply where the reason…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Theodore v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)
…successor to BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY and as successor to KENNEDY VALVE MANUFACTURING Co., Inc., MONTELLO, INC., NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), PNEUMO ABEX LLC, successor in interest to ABEX CORPORATION (ABEX)…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Shea v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…1992\]). This court cannot exercise general personal jurisdiction over Aurora because at the time this action was commenced Aurora was incorporated in Delaware with its principal place of business in North Aurora Illinois, and is a…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Dembski v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…Aff. in Supp., Exh. D at 112-113). Aurora was initially founded in Aurora, Illinois in 1919 and reorganized in 1927. In 1952, Aurora was acquired by New York Air Brake Company, a New York corporation…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Estenson v. Caterpillar Inc. (2015)
…Virginia Leeper, The Gaitan Group, 3131 Elliott Ave. Ste. 700, Seattle, WA, 98121-1047, Counsel for Appellant(s). Thomas J. Owens, Attorney at Law, 1001 4th Ave. Ste. 4400, Seattle, WA, 98154-1192, Brian P. Barrow…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…products, "in the scope of \[the plaintiff's\] entire work history," should be considered in determining whether defendant's conduct was a substantial contributing factor. Allen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 571N.W.2d530, 533 (Mich…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 27, 2016 · in the opinion
DeMartino v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Grace & Co.-Conn, 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…