8 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Ohio · May 2, 2003 · in the opinion
Lindstrom v. AC Products Liability Trust (2003)
…that he has suffered damages, and 3) prove that defendant's asbestos-containing product was a substantial factor in causing his damages. Roberts v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 726 F.Supp. 172, 174 (W.D.Mich…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · December 17, 2007 · in the opinion
Slaughter v. Union Carbide Corp. (2007)
…in Tennessee, there would be personal jurisdiction over all defendants there through the Tennessee Long-Arm Statute. Respondents rely primarily on Hansen v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 753 (Hansen), to support…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · November 26, 2013 · in the opinion
Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)
…the December 23, 2013 hearing prepared to argue the issue of successor liability. \[3\] See, e.g., Jones v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 69 F.3d 712, 716 (4th Cir. 1995) (North Carolina law); Jackson v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · October 27, 2016 · in the opinion
DeMartino v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2016)
…Grace & Co.-Conn, 216 AD2d 79 \[1st Dept. 1995\]). Issues of credibility are for the jury (Cochrane v Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 219 AD2d 557, 559-60). Where "\[t\]he deposition testimony of a litigant is…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Theodore v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)
…successor to BELL & GOSSETT COMPANY and as successor to KENNEDY VALVE MANUFACTURING Co., Inc., MONTELLO, INC., NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., OWENS-ILLINOIS, INC., PFIZER, INC. (PFIZER), PNEUMO ABEX LLC, successor in interest to ABEX CORPORATION (ABEX)…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · April 12, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. Abb, Inc. (2017)
…metal defense provides that "a manufacturer is not liable for harm caused by, and owes no duty to warn of the hazards inherent in, asbestos products that the manufacturer did not manufacture or distribute." Spychalla v…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 22, 2019 · in the opinion
Shea v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 31, 2019 · in the opinion
Dembski v. Aurora Pump Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …