9 results for “Owens-Illinois”
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion
Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)
Bowes told Gardner that Owens-Illinois currently had "in the pilot plant stage" a new type of thermal insulation, "a hydrous calcium silicate," that, when removed from a mold and dried, formed "a porous mass \[that…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012
Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)
Jayne Menssen sued Abex and Honeywell (as successor to Bendix), among others, over pleural mesothelioma she attributed to asbestos exposure while working at Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) from 1967 to 1969. She claimed they conspired…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 15, 2014 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court of Alameda County (2014)
…due to exposure to friable asbestos. Whether exposure from any particular source was a substantial factor in causing a plaintiff's injury may often be questionable (see Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th…
-
Court case · Kentucky Court of Appeals · June 2, 2017 · in the opinion
Landreth v. Brake Supply Company, Inc. (2017)
…causation where there are many possible sources of asbestos exposure, jurisdictions have fashioned different causation standards: "1) the California Supreme Court's \exposure-to-risk' test of Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953…
-
Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion
Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)
…on behalf of Real Party in Interest and Defendant and Respondent Pneumo Abex, LLC. Schiff Hardin and Eliot S. Jubelirer for Owens-Illinois, Inc., as Amicus Curiae on behalf of Real Party in Interest and Defendant…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · October 29, 2024 · in the opinion
Watts v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2024)
…no evidence of sufficient sustainability to support the claim or defense of the party opposing the motion...." (Howard v. Owens Corning (1999) 72 Cal.App.4th 621, 629-630 \[85 Cal.Rptr.2d 386\].) "On appeal…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 16, 2010 · in the opinion
Haver v. BNSF Railway Company (2010)
…to Lynne because it had no special relationship with her. Recognizing that foreseeability is a crucial factor in determining whether a defendant owes a duty of care, BNSF pointed out that the primary question to be…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…1986); see also Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 2004-1589 (La. App. 1 Cir. 9/23/05), 923 So. 2d 118, writ denied sub nom. Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 2005-2318 (La. 3…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 3, 2014
Haver v. BNSF Railway Co. (2014)
…Ford Motor Co., a premises owner owes no duty of care to family members of workers who are secondarily exposed to asbestos off the premises, whether the worker was employed by the owner or by a…