No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”

  1. Court case · New York Supreme Court · February 5, 2018

    Matter of Adesso v. AO Smith Water Prods. Co. (2018)

    …auto repair and laundering a husband's work clothes. Defendants including Foster Wheeler, Union Carbide and Cleaver-Brooks opposed. The judge applied the standard that joint trials need a plain identity of issues, looking at worksites…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · February 23, 2021 · in the opinion

    Brindell v. Carlisle Industrial Brake and Friction Inc. (2021)

    …Inc., Eaton Corporation; Great Dane LLC; Lufkin Industries, LLC; Pneumo Abex, LLC; Strick Trailers, LLC; the Port of New Orleans, LLC; the Board of Commissioners for the Port of New Orleans, LLC; Union Carbide Corporation; Wilson…

  3. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · December 14, 2017 · in the opinion

    Phillips v. Pneumo Abex, LLC (2017)

    …a Riley Stoker Corporation; SEPCO CORPORATION; MONTALVO COMPANY; TRANE U.S. INC., f/k/a American Standard, Incorporated; UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION; UNIROYAL, INCORPORATED, f/k/a United States Rubber Company, Inc.; VIKING PUMP, INCORPORATED; YARWAY CORPORATION…

  4. Court case · California Court of Appeal · June 24, 2015 · in the opinion

    Quiroz v. BNSF Railway Company (2015)

    …4th at p. 1084; see also Izell v. Union Carbide Corp. (2014) 231 Cal.App.4th 962, 968-969 (Izell)\["\In the context of a cause of action for asbestos-related latent injuries, the plaintiff must…

  5. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · August 31, 2012

    Menssen v. Pneumo Abex Corporation (2012)

    …defendants were entitled to judgment n.o.v. on the civil conspiracy claim. Punitive Damages; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) UNARCO employee Union Asbestos and Rubber Company (UNARCO) 1967-1969

  6. Court case · California Supreme Court · December 1, 2016 · in the opinion

    Kesner v. Superior Court and Haver (2016)

    …by recommendations from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health and from an Advisory Committee on Asbestos Standards composed of two employer and two labor representatives, plus a representative of the public (Industrial Union, supra…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · August 9, 2023 · in the opinion

    Wells v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)

    … Com. Money Ctr., Inc., v. Ill. Union Ins. Co., 508 F.3d 327, 336 (6th Cir. 2007) The Court agrees that, "\[w\]hile a judicial admission in a pleading has the effect of withdrawing a fact…

  8. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Fisher v. BNSF Railway Company (2022)

    …Ct. App. 1998). Other courts have applied that test. See, e.g., Chacon v. Union Pac. R., 56 Cal. App. 5th 565, 580 (Cal. Ct. App. 2020) (release for prior accident did not bar later suit…

  9. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 14, 2022 · in the opinion

    Payne v. BNSF Ry. Co. (2022)

    …L.Ed. 242 (1948) (noting that releases of railroad employees stand on the same basis as the releases of others and are entitled to prima facie validity); Mendoza-Gomez v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Arkansas · April 17, 2023 · in the opinion

    Gray v. BNSF Railway Company (2023)

    …30 years would settle all known and unknown risks from all toxic substances for $9,500. Plaintiff cites a similar case in the Nebraska district court, Butler v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 496 F.Supp…

  11. Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · July 14, 2002 · in the opinion

    Payne v. BNSF Railway Company (2002)

    …Ct. 296, 298 (1948) (noting that releases of railroad employees stand on the same basis as the releases of others and are entitled to prima facie validity); Mendoza-Gomez v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., No…

  12. Court case · Wisconsin Court of Appeals · July 8, 2022 · in the opinion

    Pepsi-Cola v. Employers Ins. Co. (2022)

    …is liable as well for the insured's legal expenses, as well as "any additional costs that the insured can show naturally resulted from the breach." Maxwell v. Hartford Union High Sch. Dist., 2012 WI 58…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Montana · July 11, 2024 · in the opinion

    Wells v. BNSF Ry. Co. (2024)

    …2010). "Where a tort claim would interfere with \rail transportation' or \operation' of railroad tracks or facilities, the regulation or claim is expressly preempted." Benson v. Union Pacific R. Co., 2008 WL 2946331, at [\3] (E…

  14. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · September 18, 2013 · in the opinion

    Gillenwater v. Honeywell Intern., Inc. (2013)

    …warning on Kaylo packages from 1943 to 1958 and Abex's attempt in 1975 to prevent inspectors of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration from mingling with union leaders during an inspection of an Abex plant…