6 results for “Union Carbide Corporation”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · May 5, 2016
Arbogast v. AW Chesterton Co. (2016)
Charles Arbogast, Jr., and his wife Barbara sued twenty-seven companies, alleging that as manufacturers or distributors of various products they exposed him to asbestos and caused his mesothelioma. The complaint raised strict liability, negligence,…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · December 1, 2022
Pyle v. AH Bennett Co. (2022)
Brian Pyle and Glenn Frericks filed separate federal lawsuits in North Dakota against many companies, alleging state-law claims arising from their occupational exposure to asbestos. The opinion does not name their diseases or describe where they…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · June 25, 2010 · in the opinion
Glein v. Boeing Company (2010)
… Pneumo Abex, LLC; Pratt & Whitney Engine Services, Inc.; and Union Carbide Corp. \[2\] The Court notes that 28 U.S.C. § 1446(c), the authority upon which Mrs. Glein relies for her "emergency" request for remand…
-
Court case · Ohio Court of Appeals · August 12, 2010 · in the opinion
Connell v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. (2010)
…time period after January 1966.\[13\] Appellant challenged Goodyear's directed verdict on the issue of asbestos exposure after January 1966 only upon the basis of a union card showing Connell assigned to a particular department…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · September 25, 2019 · in the opinion
McClung v. 3M Company (2019)
…her. See, e.g., Schneider's Dairy, Inc. v. Serv. Pers. & Employees of Dairy Indus., Teamsters Local Union No. 205, No. 13-1325, 2013 WL 6485367, at [\2] n.1 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 10, 2013…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · July 24, 2014 · in the opinion
Haas v. 3M Company (2014)
…Salerno, 937 F.2d 797, 806 (2d Cir. 1991)); see also Creamer v. Gen. Teamsters Local Union 326, 560 F. Supp. 495, 498-99 (D. Del. 1983) ("In order for testimony to be admissible under Rule…