17 results for “Owens-Corning Fiberglas”
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 27, 2010 · in the opinion
Saller v. Crown Cork & Seal Company, Inc. (2010)
…Sparks v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 472 (Sparks).) Products liability may be premised upon a theory of design defect, manufacturing defect, or failure to warn. (Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. …
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 2002 · in the opinion
McGonnell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co., Inc. (2002)
…1420-1421, 37 Cal. Rptr.2d 902), and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., supra, 28 Cal.App.4th [\29] at pages 655-656, 33 Cal.Rptr.2d 702, resulted in nonsuits or directed verdicts that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · April 22, 2021 · in the opinion
Roy v. Colgate Palmolive Co. (2021)
…Young v. Louge, 660 So. 2d 32, 49 (La. App. 4 Cir. 1995). \[28\] Adams v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 923 So. 2d 118, 123 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2005); See also Pitman v. Crane Co…
-
Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · December 26, 2001 · in the opinion
Burns v. AP Green Industries, Inc. (2001)
…184. An ability to try a case in an expeditious manner [\384] has also been recognized as a private- interest factor. Hefner v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp., 276 Ill.App.3d 1099, 213 Ill.Dec. 532…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Collin v. Calportland Company (2014)
…Formosa liken this case to Hunter, supra, 37 Cal.App.4th 1282 and Dumin v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1994) 28 Cal.App.4th 650 (Dumin). There is no fair comparison. The plaintiff in Hunter testified…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · August 30, 2024 · in the opinion
Brooks v. Mission Stucco Company (2024)
…presented to the jury." (Saller, supra, 187 Cal.App.4th at pp. 1231-1232; Anderson v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. (1991) 53 Cal.3d 987, 995; Barker v. Lull Engineering Co. (1978) 20 Cal.3d 413…
-
Court case · Florida District Court of Appeal · October 24, 2012 · in the opinion
Rich v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2012)
…determined that "predecessor in interest" does not require privity. See, e.g., Horne v. Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corp., 4 F.3d 276, 283 (4th Cir. 1993) ("\[P\]rivity is not the gravamen of the analysis. Instead…
-
Court case · U.S. Bankruptcy Court, District of Delaware · May 20, 2013 · in the opinion
In re Specialty Products Holding Corp. (2013)
…future mesothelioma claims caused by exposure to the Debtors' asbestos.\[2\] In estimation proceedings the Court is to determine that number based on the Debtors' tort system claiming history. Owens Corning v. Credit Suisse First Boston…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 13, 2009 · in the opinion
Silvestro v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2009)
…A Lite 0% CertainTeed Corp. 5% Pipe Covering/Block Insulation Armstrong, Inc. 0% Owens-Illinois 0% Pittsburg Corning 0% Johns Manville 20% JT Thorpe and Son, Inc. 0% Metalclad Insulation Corp. 0% Refractiories/Castables AP Green…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · February 22, 2022 · in the opinion
Budd v. Kaiser Gypsum Company, Inc. (2022)
…on its design defect decision. Instead, the jury based its award on Budd's injuries, which relate to all three claims. See Mavroudis v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp., 86 Wash. App. 22, 36, 935 P.2d 684…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · June 22, 2017 · in the opinion
Rockman v. Union Carbide Corp. (2017)
…of punitive damages. This Court has previously granted Georgia-Pacific summary judgment on the issue of punitive damages in a similar asbestos action, Covington v. Owens-Illinois Glass Co., No. GLR-12-461, 2014 WL 12661857…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 22, 2008 · in the opinion
Behshid v. Bondex International, Inc. (2008)
…a substantial factor in causing Dr. Behshid's mesothelioma. This contention is not persuasive. Causation in asbestos cases In Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1997) 16 Cal.4th 953 (Rutherford), the Supreme Court held that the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of California · February 12, 2013 · in the opinion
Nelson v. Air and Liquid Systems Corp. (2013)
…Gypsum Co., 98 Cal. App.4th 1098, 1103, 120 Cal.Rptr.2d 23 (2002) (citations omitted) (citing Rutherford v. Owens-Illinois, Inc., 16 Cal.4th 953, 975-76, 67 Cal.Rptr.2d 16, 941 P.2d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · September 8, 2011 · in the opinion
Saffold v. Bondex International, Inc. (2011)
…before damages can be allotted to it." (Wilson v. Ritto (2003) 105 Cal.App.4th 361, 369; Sparks v Owens-Illinois, Inc. (1995) 32 Cal.App.4th 461, 478 \[defendant manufacturer of asbestos-containing product "undisputedly…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 21, 2008 · in the opinion
Early v. A.O. Smith Water Prods. Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2008)
…Grumman Aircraft Corp. From 1965 through 1993, he worked as a millwright, maintaining machinery, including presses, ovens, boilers, pumps, and valves. He worked in the boiler room and assisted in dismantling the boiler room, which he…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · May 24, 2019 · in the opinion
Godfrey v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2019)
…ii) expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns or possesses any real property situated within the state. (CPLR …
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · April 14, 2020 · in the opinion
Montell v. Kaiser Gypsum Co. (In re New York City Asbestos Litigation, 2020)
…expects or should reasonably expect the act to have consequences in the state and derives substantial revenue from interstate or international commerce; or (4) owns, uses or possesses any real property situated within the state." (CPLR …