13 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…Crane was fraudulently joined, so Ford Motor Company's removal to federal court stood. A non-diverse defendant dismissed by involuntary summary judgment may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits…
-
Court case · Texas Court of Appeals · October 24, 2002
Vaughn v. Ford Motor Co. (2002)
The court of appeals affirmed the take-nothing judgment for Ford, General Motors, Daimler Chrysler, Allied Signal, Borg-Warner and Uniroyal, holding the exclusion of plaintiff's experts was an abuse of discretion but harmless because…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · November 8, 2010
Reaser v. AW Chesterton Company (2010)
Robert Reaser served in the Navy from 1951 to 1971, working as a pipefitter and welder on Navy vessels, including time in San Diego and Long Beach. He later lived in Florida and worked in construction and on automobiles. He was diagnosed with…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · August 27, 2014
Smith v. Bmw OF North America LLC (2014)
…affirmed the trial court's summary judgment for Ford Motor Company and Borg-Warner Corporation, against the estate of Paul Rowland, represented by Amy Smith as executrix. A company is liable as an apparent manufacturer under…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · February 16, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. John Crane (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
…Fiat Allis North America, Cross Defendant, represented by Peter S. Murphy, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC. Ford Motor Company, Cross Defendant, represented by Christian J. Singewald, White & Williams. John Crane Inc., Cross Defendant, represented by Jonathan…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · December 19, 2008 · in the opinion
Weible v. Allied Signal, Inc. (2008)
…KimberlyClark Corp., Walter B. Gallagher Co., Atco, Borg-Warner Corp., Columbia Boiler Co., Chrysler Corp., Ford Motor Co., General Motors Corp., Ingersoll Rand, John Crane, Inc., Maremont Corp., Pa Brake Bonding, Pneumo Abex Corp., United Gilsonite…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · August 1, 2014 · in the opinion
Willis v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2014)
…but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App.4th 1115, 1141 (2002) ("It is difficult to imagine how corporate malice could…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 31, 2015 · in the opinion
Bell v. Abb Group, Inc. (2015)
…806 (7th Cir. 2013) (Daubert "remains the gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Illinois · August 20, 2015 · in the opinion
Neureuther v. Atlas Copco Compressors, LLC (2015)
…gold standard for evaluating the reliability of expert testimony."). The Seventh Circuit's Opinion in Smith v. Ford Motor Co., 215 F.3d 713 (7th Cir. 2000) provides the framework for analyzing Defendant's first argument…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin · July 7, 2017 · in the opinion
Carroll v. John Crane, Inc. (2017)
…viewpoint that, because science has failed to establish that any specific dosage of asbestos causes injury, every exposure to asbestos should be considered a cause of injury." Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · March 27, 2013 · in the opinion
Jones v. John Crane, Inc. (2013)
University Ford (1989) 207 Cal.App.3d 1080, 1086-1087.) Judge Real granted Crane's motion to dismiss based on his examination of the allegations of the complaint and determination that the complaint did not state…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · March 8, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar, Inc. (2017)
…D. Delaware. [\816] Laura M. Cabutto, David W. deBruin, The deBruin Firm LLC, Wilmington, DE, for Plaintiffs. Eileen M. Ford, Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Wilmington, DE, for Defendants…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · July 24, 2013 · in the opinion
Keeney v. AW Chesterton Company (2013)
… thus, it must be claimed and may be waived \[citation\]."\]; People v. Ford (1988) 45 Cal.3d 431, 439 \["The privilege against self-incrimination is, of course, personal and may be asserted only by the holder…