No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

22 results for “Ford Motor Company”, page 1 of 2

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama · April 15, 2013

    Bobo v. Agco Corporation (2013)

    Barbara Bobo sued nine defendants, claiming she developed malignant mesothelioma from asbestos exposure. Seven were dismissed by stipulation, leaving MetLife and the Tennessee Valley Authority. She alleged that she was exposed through contact with…

  2. Court case · Tennessee Court of Appeals · March 13, 2008 · in the opinion

    Woody v. AW Chesterton Company (2008)

    …are A.W. Chesterton Company; Advance Auto Parts, Inc.; Bayer CropScience, Inc.; Borg Warner Morse TEC, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Inc.; Breeding Insulation Company, Chattanooga, Inc.; CBS Corporation; CertainTeed Corporation; Crane Company; Ford Motor Company; Foster…

  3. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · December 9, 2009 · in the opinion

    Bourque v. Anco Insulations, Inc. (2009)

    …Polk, Schell, etal., New Orleans, LA, for Defendants/Appellees, General Motors, Ford Motor Company. Court composed of JIMMIE C. PETERS, MARC T. AMY and MICHAEL G. SULLIVAN, Judges. AMY, Judge. Former employee and wife brought personal…

  4. Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015

    Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)

    …four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Northern District of California · March 30, 2021 · in the opinion

    Pizarro v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company (2021)

    …formulated. These inferences cannot be based merely on speculation, but they may be established by circumstantial evidence, in accordance with ordinary standards of proof. Romo v. Ford Motor Co., 99 Cal.App. 4th 1115, 1141 (2002)…

  6. Court case · Maryland Appellate Court · February 8, 2024 · in the opinion

    Basil-Flippen v. General Electric Company (2024)

    …it is merely incorporated into something larger, the strict liability will be found to carry through to the ultimate user or consumer," rather than to the assembler. Id. In Ford Motor Co. v. Wood, 119 Md…

  7. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · October 6, 2016 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2016)

    The rules of evidence do not permit an expert to testify that "\[j\]ust because we cannot rule anything out" that "we can rule everything in." Smith v. Ford Motor Co., No. 08-630, 2013 WL…

  8. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …to say, in the realm of asbestos exposure, the percentages alone simply do not bear out specific causation testimony one way or the other. See Yates v. Ford Motor Co., 113 F. Supp. 3d 841, 847…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 6, 2017 · in the opinion

    Bell v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. (2017)

    …plaintiff's exposure. See Rost v. Ford Motor Co., 2016 WL 6876490, at [\8] (Pa. Nov. 22, 2016) (permitting expert opinion that "Rost's exposures to asbestos at Smith Motors were sufficiently frequent, regular, and proximate…

  10. Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · June 26, 2016 · in the opinion

    Rublee v. Carrier Corp. (2016)

    …466, 472, 804 P.2d 659 (1991); RCW 4.22.920. \[22\] Ulmer v. Ford Motor Co., 75 Wash.2d 522, 452 P.2d 729 (1969) (applying § 402A strict product liability to manufacturers); Seattle-First Nat…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington · July 20, 2018 · in the opinion

    Clayton v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2018)

    …b)(2); Heliotrope Gen., Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 189 F.3d 971, 981 n.18 (9th Cir. 1999). A Rule 12(c) motion challenges the sufficiency of the opposing party's pleadings, and the court…

  12. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · March 15, 2019 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Imerys Talc America, Inc. (2019)

    …be proper under § 1441(a) even if venue might have been improper in the state court prior to removal. Id.; see also Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · September 11, 2017 · in the opinion

    MacCormack v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (2017)

    …that under some circumstances even in the case of default, where a party actively participated in the litigation previously, collateral estoppel would apply); see also Ellis v. Ford Motor Co., 628 F. Supp. 849, 857 (D…

  14. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Missouri · January 21, 2020 · in the opinion

    Douglas v. Johnson & Johnson Consumer, Inc. (2020)

    …No. 2:13-CV-04079, 2013 WL 12155465, at [\5] (W.D. Mo. June 18, 2013); Becker v. Ford Motor Co., No. 4:07CV1573 FRB, 2007 WL 4404168, at [\1] (E.D. Mo. Dec. 17, 2007…

  15. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 22, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …22]-23 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015) (applying "the…

  16. Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · September 22, 2011 · in the opinion

    Sabol v. Allied Glove Corp. (2011)

    …Company, Owens-Illinois, Inc., Plotkin Brothers Supply, Inc., Premier Refractories, Inc., Safety First Industries, Inc., and United States Steel Corporation, v. Carnegie Mellon University, General Motors Corporation, Genuine Parts Company, Lindberg, Melrath Supply and Gasket Company…

  17. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit · November 30, 2012 · in the opinion

    Ruppel v. CBS Corporation (2012)

    …give rise to liability. Second, the language in those four subparagraphs contain the hallmarks of negligence liability. See Jablonski v. Ford Motor Co., 955 N.E.2d 1138, 1153-54 (Ill. 2011) ("A product liability action. …

  18. Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · August 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Finch v. BASF Catalysts LLC (2018)

    …20] (E.D.N.C. Sept. 30, 2014), on reconsideration on other grounds sub nom. Yates v. Ford Motor Co., No. 5:12-CV-752-FL, 2015 WL 9222834 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 17, 2015)…

  19. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 22, 2020 · in the opinion

    Gomez v. Aardvark Contractors, Inc. (2020)

    …Court, E.D. Louisiana. Cary Gomez, Chucky R. Gomez, Norma C. Gomez, Brittany G. Ford & Chance J. Gomez, Plaintiffs, represented by Damon R. Pourciau, Ardoin Law Firm, Scott Michael Galante, Galante & Bivalacqua LLC & Stephanie Moore Hartman…

  20. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 19, 2017 · in the opinion

    Evans v. CBS Corp. (2017)

    …LLP, Krista Reale Samis, Eckert Seamans Cherin & Mellott, LLC, Joelle Florax, Stephanie Michelle Smith, Rawle & Henderson LLP, Eileen M. Ford, Megan Trocki Mantzavinos, Marks, O'Neill, O'Brien, Doherty & Kelly, P.C., Jessica Lee Tyler, Marshall…