No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

11 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · September 17, 2007

    Machnik v. Buffalo Pumps Inc. (2007)

    The court denied Machnik's motion to remand to state court, finding that General Electric had justified federal officer removal, so the case stayed in federal court. A government contractor may remove under the federal officer…

  2. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · October 27, 2008

    Carroll v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2008)

    …Carrolls' motion to remand, holding that defendants Viad, General Electric and Buffalo Pumps properly removed the case under the federal officer removal statute. A defendant may remove under the federal officer statute, 28 U.S.C. …

  3. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts · May 4, 2009

    Holdren v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2009)

    …Foster Wheeler, Viad, General Electric and Elliott Turbo Machinery) removed the case to federal court. They relied on the federal officer removal statute and the federal contractor defense, arguing the Navy would not have allowed asbestos…

  4. Court case · U.S. District Court, Western District of Pennsylvania · April 27, 2021

    Gay v. AO Smith Corporation (2021)

    …the 1940s and 1950s. His career included the Navy, Air Force, General Electric, Stone and Webster and automotive work. The court held that maritime law applied because the exposure occurred on naval vessels. It then reviewed…

  5. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 2, 2016 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong Int'l (2016)

    …Inc.; Fortune Brands Home & Security Inc., individually, d/b/a and as successor to Moen Inc.; Foster Wheeler LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific LLC; the Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Inc.; Graco Inc.; Grundfos…

  6. Court case · New Jersey Supreme Court · November 19, 2019 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2019)

    …Inc.; Fortune Brands Home & Security Inc., individually, d/b/a and as successor to Moen Inc.; Foster Wheeler LLC; General Electric Co.; Georgia-Pacific LLC; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Inc.; Graco Inc.; Grundfos…

  7. Court case · New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division · May 16, 2018 · in the opinion

    Whelan v. Armstrong International Inc. (2018)

    …INTERNATIONAL INC.; FORTUNE BRANDS HOME & SECURITY INC., individually, d/b/a and as successor to Moen Inc.; FOSTER WHEELER LLC; GENERAL ELECTRIC CO.; GEORGIA-PACIFIC LLC; THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.; GOULDS PUMPS INC.; GRACO INC…

  8. Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 10, 2007

    Caradonna v. AW Chesterton Co., Inc. (2007)

    Joseph Caradonna worked for the Long Island Railroad from 1949 to 1977 as a mechanic's helper, welder, train car inspector, coach cleaner and assistant foreman. He claimed he was exposed to asbestos from brake shoes, gaskets and other materials. He…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Hawaii · February 7, 2014

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2014)

    …court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, since the plaintiffs relied on general expert statements about what manufacturers typically did. Griscom-Russell had dissolved in 1962…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of Georgia · December 27, 2013

    Cabasug v. Crane Company (2013)

    …law, the court found no evidence that Emhart's distillers contained asbestos components or that Emhart supplied asbestos replacement parts, and the expert's statements were too general. The Griscom-Russell company dissolved in 1962, before…

  11. Court case · U.S. District Court, Southern District of California · March 29, 2013 · in the opinion

    Willis v. Buffalo Pumps, Inc. (2013)

    …officer) ... for or relating to any act under color of such office..." II. DISCUSSION In general, a defendant can only remove a case to federal court if the plaintiff could have brought the action there originally…