12 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
… Employer and Contractor Liability, and Workers' Compensation Worksites: Archie Motors Freight; Great Coastal Express; Archie's and Adley tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Archie Motors Freight 1964-1972; tractor-trailer fleet mechanic Great Coastal Express 1962-1964…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Central District of Illinois · February 25, 2020
Hicks v. Ford Motor Company (2020)
…Crane was fraudulently joined, so Ford Motor Company's removal to federal court stood. A non-diverse defendant dismissed by involuntary summary judgment may be treated as fraudulently joined when procedural rules (waiver, and Illinois limits…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · October 28, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…of the estate of Robie W. Walls, brought a wrongful death action in federal court in North Carolina against Ford Motor Company and other defendants. The opinion refers to Mr. Walls's Navy service on the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Middle District of North Carolina · February 25, 2022
Walls v. Ford Motor Company (2022)
…ArvinMeritor and Navistar, and loss of consortium was dismissed against Strick and Ford. Under North Carolina law, an asbestos plaintiff can show causation with direct or circumstantial evidence of regular exposure to a defendant's product…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · February 8, 2016
Lepore v. Kelsey-Hayes Co. (2016)
The Court of Appeal reversed summary judgment for Ford, Navistar and Kelsey-Hayes, finding triable issues on whether Lepore was exposed to asbestos from their products, and affirmed summary judgment for Gibbs International. A plaintiff in…
-
Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · February 3, 2017
Hayden v. 3M Co. (2017)
Thomas Hayden and his wife Jacqueline sued 3M Company and other corporations in Orleans Parish, Louisiana, in a case involving Mr. Hayden's mesothelioma. The opinion does not describe his work or exposure. Before trial, the…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · August 26, 2022 · in the opinion
Becnel v. Lamorak Insurance Co. (2022)
…exposed to asbestos from Ford vehicles, plaintiffs' claims stand. Accordingly, Ford's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. v. Navistar, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment Navistar, Inc. (f/k/a International Harvester Company) contends that…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · August 31, 2017 · in the opinion
Charlevoix v. Caterpillar (In re Asbestos Litigation, 2017)
Charlevoix performed clutch and gasket work on Ford vehicles owned by family and friends. (D.I. 216, Ex. 3 at 152:16-19) However, Mr. Milligan could not recall the manufacturer of any clutches or gaskets…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · December 4, 2012 · in the opinion
Melford v. Abex Corporation (2012)
…Corp.; Deere & Co.; Dorsey Trailers Inc.; Eaton Corp.; Fontaine Trailer Co.; Ford Motor Co.; Fruehauf Corp.; Gardner Denver Inc.; Genuine Parts Company Inc.; The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.; Goulds Pumps Incorporated; Grinnel Corp.; Harley Davidson Inc.…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · December 14, 2018 · in the opinion
Theodore v. Air & Liquid Sys. Corp. (2018)
…Successor to Rockwell Manufacturing Company, Edward Valve, Inc., Nordstrom Valves, Inc., Edward Vogt Valve Company, and Vogt Valve Company, FMC CORPORATION, on behalf of its former CHICAGO PUMP & NORTHERN PUMP BUSINESSES, FORD MOTOR COMPANY, FOSTER WHEELER…
-
Court case · Washington Court of Appeals · September 8, 2015 · in the opinion
Estenson v. Caterpillar Inc. (2015)
…CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in- interest to MUNDET CORK COMPANY); CUMMINS, INC.; DANA COMPANIES LLC (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to VICTOR GASKET MANUFACTURING COMPANY); FORD MOTOR COMPANY…
-
Court case · Rhode Island Superior Court · March 5, 2015
Jones v. 84 Lumber Company (2015)
…four areas of Tennessee law: modified comparative fault, a $750,000 cap on noneconomic damages, allocating fault to nonparties (including bankrupt companies), and the innocent retailer statute. The plaintiffs agreed Tennessee law applied but said it…