9 results for “Ford Motor Company”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · January 14, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…defendants should be \jointly and severally' liable." (Plaintiff's Complaint at pp. 7-8). A case decided in the Michigan Court of Appeals subsequent to Abel is Cousineau v. Ford Motor Company, 140 Mich.App. 19…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of North Dakota · March 28, 1990 · in the opinion
Puppe By Puppe v. AC and S., Inc. (1990)
…955 (N.D.Tex. 1978) ($10 million punitive damage award overturned by court); Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co., 119 Cal.App.3d 757, 174 Cal.Rptr. 348 (1981) (upheld trial court's reduction in punitive damage…
-
Court case · Pennsylvania Superior Court · January 25, 1991 · in the opinion
Moran v. G. & WH Corson, Inc. (1991)
…id., and "view trade relations realistically rather than mythically." Verge v. Ford Motor Co., 581 F.2d 384 (3rd Cir.1978). Thus in determining who may be "primarily responsible" [\125] and required to indemnify in a…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan · February 17, 1987 · in the opinion
Marshall v. Celotex Corp. (1987)
…and alternative liability in Marshall v. Celotex, 651 F.Supp. 389 (E.D.Mich.1987). \[2\] Cousineau v. Ford Motor Co., 140 Mich.App. 19, 33, 363 N.W.2d 721 (1985) ("\[P\]laintiff is entitled…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maine · March 17, 1986 · in the opinion
In re Moorenovich (1986)
…not recover damages for negligently inflicted mental suffering, except in connection with recovery of damages for physical injury caused by the same negligent act." Vicnire v. Ford Motor Credit Co., 401 A.2d 148, 153 (1979)…
-
Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit · March 27, 1989 · in the opinion
Dube v. Pittsburgh Corning (1989)
…768 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir.1985) (same); Ford v. American Motors Corp., 770 F.2d 465 (5th Cir.1985) (decision of postal service not to warn buyers of surplus vehicles of risk of rollovers was…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Special Appeals · January 29, 1998 · in the opinion
Adams v. Owens-Illinois (1998)
…Special Appeals of Maryland. [\60] Harry Goldman, Jr. (Goldman, Skeen & Wadler, P.A., on the brief), Baltimore, for Appellants. B. Ford Davis, Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, Baltimore, for ACandS, Inc. Edward F. Houff, Church & Houff, P.A.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Maryland · January 31, 1986 · in the opinion
Knauer v. Johns-Manville Corp. (1986)
…J. Graham and Kramon & Graham, P.A., Baltimore, Md., for defendant H.K. Porter. Donald A. Krach, F. Ford Loker, and Niles, Barton & Wilmer, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Keene Corp. Edward C. Mackie, Glenn W. Trimmer…
-
Court case · Florida Supreme Court · March 17, 1988 · in the opinion
Celotex Corp. v. Meehan (1988)
…the theoretical underpinning of our own discovery rule. As this Court stated thirty years ago in Seaboard Air Line Railroad Company v. Ford: Generally, in actions for personal injuries resulting from the wrongful act or negligence…