18 results for “General Electric”
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022
Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
Felton Robichaux sued Avondale (Huntington Ingalls) and many other companies in Louisiana state court, alleging he developed mesothelioma, diagnosed in January 2022, from asbestos exposure. He alleged he worked at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · May 17, 2022
Robichaux v. Huntington Ingalls Incorporated (2022)
Felton Robichaux sued Huntington Ingalls (Avondale) and many other defendants in Louisiana state court. He alleged he developed mesothelioma from asbestos exposure while working at Avondale Shipyards from 1961 to 1979 as a carpenter and insulator.…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · March 17, 2022 · in the opinion
Savoie v. Huntington Ingalls (2022)
…24, 2014). In Vedros, the plaintiff filed suit against multiple defendants in state court, and three defendants, General Electric, Foster-Wheeler, and Westinghouse, subsequently removed the case pursuant to the federal officer removal statute. Id. at…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut · July 16, 2002 · in the opinion
Yale University v. Cigna Ins. Co. (2002)
…In that case, the court concluded that repair and replacement costs incurred by the insured on account of damage to electrical transformers caused by a design defect were not "ensuing losses." Id. In support of its…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · July 29, 2015
Vedros v. Northrop Grumman Shipbuilding, Inc. (2015)
…of asbestos knowledge, the Walsh-Healey Act, specific risk percentages, life expectancy, and general symptoms and quality of life, plus an unlisted 1956 article. It also struck his rebuttal report to Dr. Stockman. It kept the…
-
Court case · Delaware Supreme Court · September 12, 2016 · in the opinion
In re Viking Pump, Inc. (2016)
As a general principle, a clause restricting assignment does not in any way limit the policyholder's power to make an assignment of the rights under the policy — consisting of the right to receive the proceeds…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · January 30, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
\[131\] There are two exceptions to the general rule that would allow creditors to proceed against the debtor for the post-petition interest: (1) when a creditor is oversecured under § 506(b); and (2) under § 726…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Delaware · June 11, 2012 · in the opinion
In re WR Grace & Co. (2012)
Moreover, the General Growth Properties Court relied on several equitable considerations in arriving at its decision, including that the default rate would not constitute a "penalty" to the "exceedingly solvent" debtor, a lack of misconduct, and…
-
Court case · Delaware Court of Chancery · October 14, 2009 · in the opinion
Viking Pump, Inc. v. Century Indemnity Company (2009)
§ 35:7 (noting that the "the great majority of courts adhere to the rule that general stipulations in policies prohibiting assignments thereof except with the consent of the insurer apply only to assignments before loss, and…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · September 12, 1991
Mitchell, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty (1991)
…the insured, was entitled to a defense and indemnity because coverage is triggered at least by exposure to its asbestos products during the policy period. Under a standard form comprehensive general liability policy, "bodily injury" from…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court · August 20, 2010 · in the opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company v. American Re-Insurance Company (2010)
…pay "all sums" up to the policy limit, which the insured shall become liable to pay as damages, and not just for damages that occur during the policy period (Aerojet-General Corp. v Transport Indem. Co.…
-
Court case · Montana Supreme Court · March 25, 2020 · in the opinion
Maryland Cas. Co. v. Asbestos Claims Court (2020)
…and through it, the general public." He expressed particular concern the Mill workers' union or local attorneys could become aware of the scope of the lung damage issues at the Mill. ¶76 Larrick also informed Hopkins…
-
Court case · Maryland Court of Appeals · April 3, 2020 · in the opinion
Rossello v. Zurich American Insurance Company (2020)
…INSURANCE LAW—INDEMNITY—COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY POLICIES—APPORTIONMENT—PRO RATA—TRIGGER OF COVERAGE—INJURY-IN-FACT TRIGGER—CONTINUOUS TRIGGER The Court of Appeals held that damages from a continuous bodily injury judgment must be allocated on…
-
Court case · New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division · January 24, 2012 · in the opinion
US Fid. & Guaranty Co. v. American Re-Ins. Co. (2012)
…brevity, we presume familiarity with the case, and provide a general overview of the facts directly relevant to this appeal. The Underlying Asbestos Claims In the 1950s and 1960s, Western Asbestos was a company that sold…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corporation (2009)
…issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a pre-packaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · June 17, 2014 · in the opinion
Morvant v. Maryland Casualty Company (2014)
…2010) (Duval, J.). In RepublicBank, the Fifth Circuit considered state and federal actions involving the same general subject matter and sharing a common issue, the validity of a promissory note. 828 F.2d at 1121. The…
-
Court case · U.S. District Court, District of New Jersey · August 17, 2009 · in the opinion
In re Congoleum Corp. (2009)
…issued, described Congoleum's ongoing efforts at filing a prepackaged bankruptcy. (See Coverage Decision, A1297.) A general meeting with GHR and several claimants' representatives, including Claimants' Counsel, was held in New York on November 19, 2002…
-
Court case · California Court of Appeal · May 24, 2024 · in the opinion
Perez v. Century Indemnity Co. (2024)
…its van or stepped inside. We agree with plaintiffs that the brakes remained in Universal's possession as they lay untouched in the back of its van. (See General Casualty Co. of America v. Azteca Films…