No fee unless we recover compensation for your family Text size 833-4-ASBESTOS (833-427-2378) Free Case Review

Search

14 results for “General Electric”

  1. Court case · Oregon Court of Appeals · February 8, 2012

    Portland General Electric Company v. Ebasco Services, Inc. (2012)

    …and vacated the supplemental fee judgment in favor of Portland General Electric. A court lacks jurisdiction to enter a default judgment for more than the amount prayed for in the complaint unless the defaulting party had…

  2. Court case · California Court of Appeal · April 30, 1996 · in the opinion

    Armstrong World Industries v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. (1996)

    …were not dangerous. There was concern about the dustiness of Armaspray — but not so much for health reasons as for reasons of cleanup and potential damage to electrical equipment. The specifications for Armaspray called for good…

  3. Court case · New York Supreme Court · January 24, 2018

    Konstantin v. Certain Underwriters AT Lloyd's London (2018)

    …in bad faith and in a predatory manner. Insurance Coverage; Trial Procedure and Discovery Worksites: buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor carpenter buildings where Tishman Realty had acted as the general contractor

  4. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · September 27, 2024

    Craft v. Eagle, Inc. (2024)

    The Louisiana Fourth Circuit granted Climmie Craft's writ application, reversed the trial court's rulings limiting her industrial hygiene expert Kenneth Garza to general opinions, and remanded, ruling against the defendants (Ports America Gulfport, Crowley…

  5. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania · March 30, 2007 · in the opinion

    AstenJohnson v. Columbia Cas. Co. (2007)

    …to Commerce and Industry Insurance Company, Asten represented: "It has been our policy to apprise Asten-Hill \[Manufacturing Company\]'s general liability and excess liability carriers of all pending claims, enclosing a photocopy of each Complaint…

  6. Court case · Louisiana Court of Appeals · June 22, 2016 · in the opinion

    Boudreaux v. Bollinger Shipyard (2016)

    …It is well-established that the trial court is afforded wide discretion in determining [\771] whether expert testimony should be admitted and who should or should not be qualified as an expert. See General Elec. Co…

  7. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · March 5, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 through 400, Defendants, (Allianz Underwriters…

  8. Court case · Illinois Appellate Court · June 4, 2013 · in the opinion

    John Crane, Inc. v. Admiral Insurance Company (2013)

    …UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS OF LONDON, and CERTAIN LONDON MARKET INSURANCE COMPANIES, Including Excess Insurance Company, Ltd., General Reinsurance Corporation, River Thames Insurance Company, World Auxiliary Insurance Corporation, and John Does 1 Through 400, Defendants (Allianz Underwriters…

  9. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · January 11, 2023 · in the opinion

    Lebeau v. Huntington Ingalls Inc. (2023)

    … to pertain; refer; to bring into association with or connection with.'"\[66\] Unlike the general removal statute, which must be strictly construed in favor of remand, the Federal Officer Removal statute's language must be liberally…

  10. Court case · U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Louisiana · September 18, 2014 · in the opinion

    Landry v. Columbia Casualty Company (2014)

    …a voluntary act of Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs correctly argue that the general rule is that "other paper" does not render a case removable unless it is generated by the voluntary act of a plaintiff. Plaintiffs' argument fails…

  11. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit · January 27, 1998 · in the opinion

    In re Asbestos Litigation (1998)

    …Amchem, \_\_\_ U.S. at \_\_\_, 117 S.Ct. at 2248. This general theme, expressed forcefully in Amchem, is reinforced by the Court's discussion of specific issues, most of which are highly relevant to the instant case…

  12. Court case · New York Supreme Court · July 5, 2017 · in the opinion

    Konstantin v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. (2017)

    …alleges that Resolute Defendants' delaying and denying of plaintiff's claims is consumer-oriented because it is part of the Resolute Defendants' business model and their general practice inordinately to delay and deny claims without merit…

  13. Court case · U.S. District Court, District of Columbia · June 1, 1989 · in the opinion

    Carey Canada Inc. v. California Union Ins. Co. (1989)

    …Thus, the meaning of asbestosis was a matter of public record years before defendants' policies were sold. Numerous general circulation newspaper and magazine articles about the various asbestos-related health hazards, including articles in The New…

  14. Court case · U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit · May 1, 2012 · in the opinion

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc. (2012)

    …"The presumption is that the statute flows in orderly progression [\370] from general statement to specific instance so that ordinarily the qualification of a later clause upon an earlier one is to be expected." 1A Norman…